Modeling collusion as an informed principal problem∗

نویسنده

  • Lucía Quesada
چکیده

In this paper we address the question of collusion in mechanisms under asymmetric information by assuming that one of the colluding parties offers a side contract to the other one. We develop a methodology to analyze collusion as an informed principal problem. We show that if collusion occurs after the agents accept or reject the principal’s offer, the dominant-strategy implementation of the optimal contract without collusion is collusion proof. In the second part of the paper, we look at a different timing, assuming that the agents’ decision to accept or reject the principal’s offer is taken after collusion, so the agents share their private information before accepting the principal’s offer. On the other hand, we assume that the collusion offer includes a punishment strategy, to be used whenever the other agent rejects the side contract. We establish the conditions that have to be satisfied for a contract to be collusion proof and we show that the optimal contract without collusion is no longer collusion proof. The optimal collusion proof contract is asymmetric, both in transfers and in quantities. JEL Codes: C72, D23, D82, L23

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Collusion in Organizations and Management of Conflicts through Job Design and Authority Delegation

We analyze a principal-supervisor-two agent hierarchy with supervisory efforts, provide a characterization of the equilibrium of the game, and show which regime improves efficiency between the collusion-proof regime and the lateral collusion one, under the assumptions that the principal is less informed, and that the side-trade is costly. By coping with the trade-off between the value of inform...

متن کامل

The Organization of Expertise in the Presence of Communication

A decision-maker has to elicit information from multiple informed experts about a policy’s value. The principal may prevent communication among agents. However, it may be in the principal’s interest to allow communication among them. I assume that communication allows some synergies among experts to emerge but also opens the possibility of collusion among them. I study the optimal design of con...

متن کامل

Information Acquisition and the Organization of Expertise in the Presence of Communication

A decision-maker has to elicit information from informed multiple experts about a policy’s value. The principal may prevent communication among agents. However, it may be in the principal’s interest to allow communication among them. We assume that communication lets some synergies among experts emerge but also opens the possibility of collusion among them. We study the optimal design of contra...

متن کامل

Mechanism design with collusive supervision

We analyze an adverse selection environment with third party supervision. We assume that the supervisor and the agent can collude while interacting with the principal. As long as the supervisor is symmetrically informed with the agent, the former’s existence does not improve the principal’s rent extraction. This is due to the coalitional efficiency between the supervisor and the agent. However,...

متن کامل

Collusion and signaling in auctions with interdependent values

The standard mechanism design approach to collusion in auctions posits an uninformed, disinterested third party who designs and implements the mechanism. However, in many environments, collusion agreements are likely to be both proposed and executed by the involved parties. When this is the case, the standard approach may be inadequate; it neglects potential information leakages and minimizes f...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003