Projected Health and Economic Benefits of the Use of Sirolimus-eluting Coronary Stents
نویسندگان
چکیده
Despite remarkable technological progress in interventional cardiology, the success of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains limited by in-stent restenosis. Recent trials of sirolimuseluting stents have shown promising results regarding this complication. We estimated the potential health-economic benefits of sirolimuseluting stents. A decision-analytic model was developed from a payor’s perspective to estimate the cost effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with standard bare-metal stents in PCI, as well as with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery for a 500 000-member healthcare plan. The model input health plan–specific data for volume and reimbursement rates for PCI and CABG; the results of a randomized trial comparing the 2 types of stents were used as a reference. A mean of 1.4 stents per patient for comparisons with PCI, and 2.8 stents per patient for comparisons with CABG in multivessel cases, and an incremental cost of $2000 per stent for the drug-eluting versus the bare-metal stent were assumed. Supposing that patients at high risk for restenosis are selected first, the use of a sirolimuseluting stent rather than a standard stent in 49% of current PCIs was associated with a total cost increase of $295 for the plan and 202 fewer hospital days. If all patients who currently receive a standard stent received a sirolimus-eluting stent, an incremental cost of $568 823 for the health plan and 284 fewer hospital days were calculated. If all patients currently eligible to receive a standard stent, plus 39% of patients with multivessel disease who are typically referred for CABG surgery, were treated instead with a sirolimus-eluting stent, the estimated savings for the health plan totaled $2993, and hospital days were reduced by 745 days. In this model, substituting a sirolimus-eluting stent for a bare-metal stent in patients at high risk for in-stent restenosis was cost-neutral and reduced the incidence of repeated hospitalization. Sirolimus-eluting stents offer substantial cost savings for a health plan if their use can be expanded to a modest subset of patients currently referred for CABG surgery. (Adv Stud Med. 2003;3(6D):S602-S611)
منابع مشابه
نتایج بالینی پس از آنژیوپلاستی عروق کرونر، بروز حوادث بزرگ قلبی-عروقی و عوارض انواع استنت
Background: Cardiovascular diseases alone have become the leading cause of death worldwide. One of the treatment methods cardiovascular disease is angioplasty. This study aimed to investigate the clinical results after coronary artery angioplasty, based on the incidence of major cardiovascular events with emphasis on stent types. Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, the preval...
متن کاملEconomic evaluation of sirolimus-eluting stents.
BACKGROUND Sirolimus-eluting stents have recently been shown to reduce the risk of restenosis among patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Given that sirolimus-eluting stents cost about 4 times as much as conventional stents, and considering the volume of PCI procedures, the decision to use sirolimus-eluting stents has large economic implications. METHODS We performed ...
متن کامل[Antiproliferative drug-eluting stents: systematic review of the benefits and estimate of economic impact].
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Antiproliferative drug-coated stents are a possible solution for post-angioplasty coronary restenosis. Here we analyze their efficacy, effectiveness and safety, and estimate the economic impact of their use in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHOD Systematic review (meta-analysis) of the scientific evidence available up to January 2004, and analysis of hospital costs within a...
متن کاملCoated stents to prevent restenosis in coronary heart disease
BACKGROUND In-stent-restenosis (ISR) is considered to be an essential limiting factor of stenting in coronary heart disease (CHD). The development of coated stents has raised expectations on substantial lowering restenosis after stenting with decreasing the rate of restenosis and a reduction in the rate of clinical events. OBJECTIVES The present analysis addresses the questions on medical eff...
متن کاملCost analysis from two randomized trials of sirolimus-eluting stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease.
OBJECTIVES This study sought to analyze the cost of percutaneous coronary interventions with use of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) or paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in patients at high risk of restenosis. BACKGROUND Recent studies have shown different clinical efficacy with these drug-eluting stents. Whether this difference extends on cost estimates between the 2 stents is not known. METHO...
متن کامل