Testing Endogeneity with Possibly Invalid Instruments and High Dimensional Covariates
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Durbin-Wu-Hausman (DWH) test is a commonly used test for endogeneity in instrumental variables (IV) regression. Unfortunately, the DWH test depends, among other things, on assuming all the instruments are valid, a rarity in practice. In this paper, we show that the DWH test often has distorted size even if one IV is invalid. Also, the DWH test may have low power when many, possibly high dimensional, covariates are used to make the instruments more plausibly valid. To remedy these shortcomings, we propose a new endogeneity test which has proper size and better power when invalid instruments and high dimemsional covariates are present; in low dimensions, the new test is optimal in that its power is equivalent to the “oracle” DWH test’s power that knows which instruments are valid. The paper concludes with a simulation study of the new test with invalid instruments and high dimensional covariates.
منابع مشابه
Testing Endogeneity with High Dimensional Covariates∗
Modern, high dimensional data has renewed investigation on instrumental variables (IV) analysis, primary focusing on estimation of the included endogenous variable under sparsity and little attention towards specification tests. This paper studies in high dimensions the Durbin-Wu-Hausman (DWH) test, a popular specification test for endogeneity in IV regression. We show, surprisingly, that the D...
متن کاملIdentification and Inference With Many Invalid Instruments
We study estimation and inference in settings where the interest is in the effect of a potentially endogenous regressor on some outcome. To address the endogeneity we exploit the presence of additional variables. Like conventional instrumental variables, these variables are correlated with the endogenous regressor. However, unlike conventional instrumental variables, they also have direct effec...
متن کاملEnhanced routines for instrumental variables/GMM estimation and testing
We extend our 2003 paper on instrumental variables (IV) and GMM estimation and testing and describe enhanced routines that address HAC standard errors, weak instruments, LIML and k-class estimation, tests for endogeneity and RESET and autocorrelation tests for IV estimates.
متن کاملWorking Paper Number 125 August 2007 , revised May 2008 A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments
The Difference and System generalized method of moments (GMM) estimators are growing in popularity, thanks in part to specialized software. But as implemented in these packages, the estimators easily generate results by default that are at once invalid yet appear valid in specification tests. The culprit is their tendency to generate instruments that are a) numerous and, in System GMM, b) suspe...
متن کاملConfidence Intervals for Causal Effects with Invalid In- struments using Two-Stage Hard Thresholding
The instrumental variable (IV) method is commonly used to estimate the causal effect of a treatment on an outcome by using IVs that satisfy the assumptions of association with treatment, no direct effect on the outcome and ignorability. A major challenge in IV analysis is to find said IVs, but typically one is unsure of whether all of the putative IVs are in fact valid (i.e. satisfy the assumpt...
متن کامل