Brain responses related to semantic meaning.
نویسندگان
چکیده
s.Brussels: Presses Universitaires de Bruxelles. Pp. 43-45. (b)Chapman, R. M. (Chair). 1976. ERPS and language. Transcript of the panel at the FourthInternational Congress on Event Related Slow Potentials of the Brain (EPIC IV),David A. Otto, Program Chair., Hendersonville, N.C.Chapman, R. M., & Bragdon, H. R. 1964. Evoked responses to numerical and non-numericalvisual stimuli while problem solving. Nature (London), 203, 1155-1157. Chapman, R. M., Bragdon, H. R., Chapman, J. A., & McCrary, J. W. 1977. Semanticmeaning of words and average evoked potentials. In J. E. Desmedt (Ed.), Progress inclinical neurophysiology. Vol. 3: Language and hemispheric specialization in man:Cerebral event-related potentials. Basel: Karger. Pp. 36-47.Chapman, R. M., McCrary, J. W., Bragdon, H. R., & Chapman, J. A. In press. Latentcomponents of event-related potentials functionally related to information process-ing. In J. E. Desmedt (Ed.), Progress in clinical neurophysiology. Vol. 6: Cognitivecomponents in cerebral event-related potentials and selective attention. Basal:Karger BRAIN RESPONSES AND SEMANTIC MEANING205 Dixon, W. J. (Ed.) 1975. BMDP biomedical computer programs. Berkeley: University ofCalifornia Press.Feldman, R. M., & Goldstein, R. 1967. Averaged evoked responses to synthetic syntaxsentences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 10, 689-696.Friedman, D., Simson, R., Ritter, W., & Rapin, I. 1975.Cortical evoked potentials elicited byreal speech words and human sounds. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 38,13-19. (a)Friedman, D., Simson, R., Ritter, W., & Rapin, I. 1975. The late positive component (P300)and information processing in sentences. Electroencephalography and ClinicalNeurophysiology, 38, 255-262. (b)Heise, D. R. 1971.Evaluation, potency, andactivityscoresfor 1551 words:A mergingofthree published lists. Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina, Department of Sociology.Kaiser, H. F. 1958. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 23, 187-200.Miron, M. S., & Osgood, C. E. 1966. Language behavior: The multivariate structure ofqualification. In R. B. Cattell (Ed.), Handbook of multivariate experimentalpsychology. Chicago: Rand-McNally. Pp. 790-819. Molfese, D. L. 1977. The ontogeny of cerebral asymmetry in man: Auditory evokedpotentials to linguistic and non-linguistic stimuli. In J. E. Desmedt (Ed.), Progress inclinical neurophysiology. Vol. 3: Language and hemispheric specialization in man:Cerebral event-related potentials. Base]: Karger. Pp. 188-204.Molfese, D. L., Freeman, R. B., & Palermo, D. S. 1975.The ontogeny of brain lateralizationfor speech and nonspeech stimuli. Brain and Language, 2, 356-368. Molfese, D. L., Nunez, V., Seibert, S., & Ramanaiah, N. V. 1976. Cerebral asymmetry:Changes in factors affecting its development. In S. R. Harnad, H. D. Steklis, & J.Lancaster (Eds.), Origins and evolution of language and speech. Annals of the NewYork Academy of Sciences, 280, 821-833.Osgood, C. E. 1971. Exploration in semantic space: A personal diary. Journal of SocialIssues, 27, 5-63.Osgood, C. E., May, W. H., & Miron, M. S. 1975. Cross-cultural universals of affectivemeaning. Urbana, III.: University of Illinois Press. Regan, D. 1972.Evoked potentials in psychology, sensory physiology, and clinical medicine. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Rummel, R. J. 1970.Appliedfactor analysis. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Pp. 246-247.Shelburne, S. A., Jr. 1972. Visual evoked responses to word and nonsense syllable stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 32, 17-25. Shelburne, S. A., Jr. 1973. Visual evoked responses to language stimuli in normal children.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 34, 135-143.Teyler, T. J., Roemer, R. A., Harrison, T. F., & Thompson, R. F. 1973. Humanscalp-recorded evoked-potential correlates of linguistic stimuli. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1, 333-334. Thatcher, R. W. 1977. Evoked potential correlates of delayed letter matching. BehavioralBiology 19, l-23. (a)Thatcher, R. W. 1977. Evoked potential correlates of hemispheric lateralization duringsemantic information processing. In S. Harnad et al. (Eds.), Lateralization in thenervous system. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 429-448. (b)Wood, C. C. 1975. Auditory and phonetic levels of processing in speech perception:Neurophysiological and information-processing analyses. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Human Perception and Performance, 104, 3-20.Wood, C. C., Goff, W. R., & Day, R. S. 1971. Auditory evoked potentials during speechperception. Science, 173, 1248-1251.
منابع مشابه
Neuromagnetic evidence for early semantic access in word recognition.
Magnetic brain responses recorded in the human magnetoencephalogram (MEG) distinguished between words with different semantics but carefully matched for frequency and length. Multiple recordings from a single subject showed that 100 ms following stimulus onset, significantly stronger neuromagnetic responses were elicited by words with strong multimodal semantic associations than by other word m...
متن کاملDeveloping a Semantic Similarity Judgment Test for Persian Action Verbs and Non-action Nouns in Patients With Brain Injury and Determining its Content Validity
Objective: Brain trauma evidences suggest that the two grammatical categories of noun and verb are processed in different regions of the brain due to differences in the complexity of grammatical and semantic information processing. Studies have shown that the verbs belonging to different semantic categories lead to neural activity in different areas of the brain, and action verb processing is r...
متن کاملBehavioral and neural analyses of connotative meaning: word classes and rating scales.
Behavioral (semantic differential) and neural (Evoked Potentials, EPs) responses were related to connotative meaning. The approach was based on Osgood’s semantic analyses and dimensions of Evaluation (E), Potency (P), and Activity (A). The experimental variables were (I) the semantic class of the stimulus word (E+, E, P+ , P-, A+, A-) and (2) the dimension of the semantic scale (E, P. A) which ...
متن کاملA syntactic-semantic analysis of \"منصوب به نزع خافض\"based on the Holy Quran
One of important issues in the field of implication and aggression is "منصوب به نزع خافض". It is an idiom related to مفعول به "”. By referring to its definition, a syntactic-semantic analysis will be done in this paper. It tries to indicate what is the relationship between word and meaning and to what extent Arabic syntax focu...
متن کاملDistinct neural correlates for pragmatic and semantic meaning processing: an event-related potential investigation of scalar implicature processing using picture-sentence verification.
The present study examines the brain-level representation and composition of meaning in scalar quantifiers (e.g., some), which have both a semantic meaning (at least one) and a pragmatic meaning (not all). We adopted a picture-sentence verification design to examine event-related potential (ERP) effects of reading infelicitous quantifiers for which the semantic meaning was correct with respect ...
متن کاملNeural correlates of semantic priming for ambiguous words: an event-related fMRI study.
We investigated the neural correlates of semantic priming by using event-related fMRI to record blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) responses while participants performed speeded lexical decisions (word/nonword) on visually presented related versus unrelated prime-target pairs. A long stimulus onset asynchrony of 1000 ms was employed, which allowed for increased controlled processing and select...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Brain and language
دوره 5 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1978