1 Text and Context : Contract Interpretation as Contract Design
نویسندگان
چکیده
Contract interpretation remains the most important source of commercial litigation and the most contentious area of contemporary contract doctrine and scholarship. Two polar positions have competed for dominance in contract interpretation. In a textualist regime, generalist courts cannot consider context; in a contextualist regime, they must. Underlying this dispute are contrary assumptions about the prototypical contract each interpretive style addresses. For modern textualists, contracts are bespoke, between legally sophisticated parties who embed as much or as little of the contractual context as they wish in an integrated writing, and prefer to protect their choices against judicial interference by an interpretive regime including parole evidence and plain meaning rules. For contextualists in contrast, contracts are between legally unsophisticated parties in two prototypical settings. The first is the mass market, standardized contract between sophisticated sellers and unsophisticated consumers, who cannot bargain over contractual terms; the second involves commercial parties doing business in a deeply nuanced world where formal and informal understandings mix and the meaning of a particular contract can be illuminated by the parties' course of dealings. For the contextualist, willfully restricting a court's access to information bearing on the parties' real relationship in both cases degrades judicial interpretation. We argue that the narrow focus on which prototype should apply universally has erroneously framed discussion of the parties’ choices and led to an inconclusive and limited debate about the role of courts in contract interpretation. The range of options for parties and * Marc and Eva Stern Professor of Law and Business, Columbia University; Charles J. Meyers Professor of Law and Business, Stanford University; European Corporate Governance Institute. * Maurice T. Moore Professor of Law, Columbia University. ** Alfred McCormack Professor of Law and Director, Center for Contract and Economic Organization, Columbia University. The Kauffman Foundation provided support for the research project of which this Article is part.
منابع مشابه
Text and Context: Contract Interpretation as Contract Design
Contract interpretation remains the most important source of commercial litigation and the most contentious area of contemporary contract doctrine and scholarship. Two polar positions have competed for dominance in contract interpretation. In a textualist regime, generalist courts cannot consider context; in a contextualist regime, they must. Underlying this dispute are contrary assumptions abo...
متن کاملسیر تحول ماهیت اقاله در حقوق اسلام و ایران، با مطالعه تطبیقی در حقوق انگلیس و فرانسه
In this article, we has surveyed The evolution of nature of dissolution of contract Shi’it Jurisprudence, Sunni Jurisprudence schools and Iranian Law, with Comparative Study in England and French Law. Goal of this research was explaining the legal nature of dissolution of contract and effect of dissolution of contract in determining the rules and effects of this legal entity, and also ind...
متن کاملA Patent Panacea?: The Promise of Corbinized Claim Construction
A patent's claims define the scope of a patent-holder's right to exclude others. Because patent infringement actions often hinge on how a court construes claim terms, the interpretative approach that a court uses has a significant effect on the scope ofpatent rights. This article examines claim construction through the lens of contract law. In theory, the Federal Circuit has explicitly rejected...
متن کاملماهیت و آثار قرارداد سلف موازی
Parallel Forward contract is a contract that anticipated to resolve the limitations arising from the forward sale. This contract is parallel to the primary forward contract, forward contract to be signed first, second independent predecessor in terms of commitments and associated works contract has complete autonomy over index futures; the buyer of the forward contract take place in the s...
متن کاملContract for the formation of a bank account in Iranian law and comparative
Abstract: By creating a bank account agreement, an account is opened under the name of the applicant in the name of the bank. In accordance with the provisions of this agreement and the intention of the parties to the contract, the bank undertakes to accept all the funds the account holder or third parties intend to deposit into this account with the account holder, and, accordingly, the acco...
متن کامل