Long-term efficacy and safety of biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stents: main results of the Basel Stent Kosten-Effektivitäts Trial-PROspective Validation Examination II (BASKET-PROVE II), a randomized, controlled noninferiority 2-year outcome trial.

نویسندگان

  • Christoph Kaiser
  • Soeren Galatius
  • Raban Jeger
  • Nicole Gilgen
  • Jan Skov Jensen
  • Christoph Naber
  • Hannes Alber
  • Maria Wanitschek
  • Franz Eberli
  • David J Kurz
  • Giovanni Pedrazzini
  • Tiziano Moccetti
  • Hans Rickli
  • Daniel Weilenmann
  • André Vuillomenet
  • Martin Steiner
  • Stefanie Von Felten
  • Deborah R Vogt
  • Kim Wadt Hansen
  • Peter Rickenbacher
  • David Conen
  • Christian Müller
  • Peter Buser
  • Andreas Hoffmann
  • Matthias Pfisterer
چکیده

BACKGROUND Biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DES) were developed to be as effective as second-generation durable-polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DES) and as safe >1 year as bare-metal stents (BMS). Thus, very late stent thrombosis (VLST) attributable to durable polymers should no longer appear. METHODS AND RESULTS To address these early and late aspects, 2291 patients presenting with acute or stable coronary disease needing stents ≥3.0 mm in diameter between April 2010 and May 2012 were randomly assigned to biolimus-A9-eluting BP-DES, second-generation everolimus-eluting DP-DES, or thin-strut silicon-carbide-coated BMS in 8 European centers. All patients were treated with aspirin and risk-adjusted doses of prasugrel. The primary end point was combined cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target-vessel revascularization within 2 years. The combined secondary safety end point was a composite of VLST, myocardial infarction, and cardiac death. The cumulative incidence of the primary end point was 7.6% with BP-DES, 6.8% with DP-DES, and 12.7% with BMS. By intention-to-treat BP-DES were noninferior (predefined margin, 3.80%) compared with DP-DES (absolute risk difference, 0.78%; -1.93% to 3.50%; P for noninferiority 0.042; per protocol P=0.09) and superior to BMS (absolute risk difference, -5.16; -8.32 to -2.01; P=0.0011). The 3 stent groups did not differ in the combined safety end point, with no decrease in events >1 year, particularly VLST with BP-DES. CONCLUSIONS In large vessel stenting, BP-DES appeared barely noninferior compared with DP-DES and more effective than thin-strut BMS, but without evidence for better safety nor lower VLST rates >1 year. Findings challenge the concept that durable polymers are key in VLST formation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01166685.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Two-year outcome of a randomized trial comparing second-generation drug-eluting stents using biodegradable or durable polymer.

Two-Year Outcome of a Randomized Trial Comparing Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Using Biodegradable or Durable Polymer Recentnetworkmeta-analyseshave raisedconcerns about the safety of biodegradable polymerdrug-eluting stents (BP-DES) compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES).1-3 The NOBORI Biolimus-Eluting vs XIENCE/ PROMUSEverolimus-ElutingStentTrial (NEXT) is a9...

متن کامل

Effect of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer vs bare-metal stents on cardiovascular events among patients with acute myocardial infarction: the COMFORTABLE AMI randomized trial.

CONTEXT The efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents remains controversial in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). OBJECTIVE To compare stents eluting biolimus from a biodegradable polymer with bare-metal stents in primary PCI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS A prospectiv...

متن کامل

Randomized Comparison of a Biodegradable Polymer Ultrathin Strut Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

In percutaneous coronary interventions, drug-eluting stents (DESs) have reduced the risk of restenosis and repeat revascularization compared with bare-metal stents. The secondgeneration DESs with thinner stent struts have improved safety and efficacy compared with the first-generation DESs and has been associated with a reduced risk of late stent thrombosis. The persistence of polymer material ...

متن کامل

Efficacy and Safety of Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents versus Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUNDS Drug-eluting stents (DES) with biodegradable polymers have been developed to address the risk of thrombosis associated with first-generation DES. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BES) versus durable polymer DES. METHODS Systematic database searches of MEDLINE (1950 to June 2013), EMBASE (1966 to June 2013), the Cochran...

متن کامل

Biolimus-eluting biodegradable polymer-coated stent versus durable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent in unselected patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (SORT OUT V): a randomised non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND Third-generation biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents might reduce the risk of stent thrombosis compared with first-generation permanent polymer drug-eluting stents. We aimed to further investigate the effects of a biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent compared with a durable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent in a population-based setting. METHODS This randomised, ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Circulation

دوره 131 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015