Inferences from Indifference - Zone Selection Procedures
نویسنده
چکیده
Two-stage indifference-zone selection procedures have been widely studied and applied. It is known that most indifference-zone selection procedures also guarantee multiple comparisons with the best confidence intervals with half-width corresponding to the indifference amount. We provide the statistical analysis of multiple comparisons with a control confidence interval that bounds the difference between each design and the unknown best and multiple comparisons with the best confidence intervals. The efficiency of selection procedures can be improved by taking into consideration the differences of sample means, using the variance reduction technique of common random numbers, and using sequentialized selection procedures. An experimental performance evaluation demonstrates the validity of the confidence intervals and efficiency of sequentialized selection procedures.
منابع مشابه
Fully Sequential Indifference-Zone Selection Procedures with Variance-Dependent Sampling
Fully sequential indifference-zone selection procedures have been proposed in the simulation literature to select the system with the best mean performance from a group of simulated systems. However, the existing sequential indifference-zone procedures allocate an equal number of samples to the two systems in comparison even if their variances are drastically different. In this paper we propose...
متن کاملExpected Opportunity Cost Guarantees and Indifference Zone Selection Procedures
Selection procedures help identify the best of a finite set of simulated alternatives. The indifference-zone approach focuses on the probability of correct selection, but the expected opportunity cost of a potentially incorrect decision may make more sense in business contexts. This paper provides the first selection procedure that guarantees an upper bound for the expected opportunity cost, in...
متن کاملOptimal Computing Budget Allocation of Indifference-zone-selection Procedures
Indifference-zone-selection procedures have been widely studied and applied to determine the required sample sizes for selecting a good design from k alternatives. However, efficiency is still a key concern for application of simulation to ranking and selection problems. In this paper, we present a new approach that can further enhance the efficiency of indifferencezone-selection procedures. Ou...
متن کاملA Fully Sequential Elimination Procedure for Indifference-Zone Ranking and Selection with Tight Bounds on Probability of Correct Selection
We consider the indifference-zone (IZ) formulation of the ranking and selection problem with independent normal samples and known sampling variance. In this problem, we must use stochastic simulation to select the best among several noisy simulated systems, with a statistical guarantee on solution quality. Existing IZ procedures sample excessively in problems with many alternatives, in part bec...
متن کاملSequential selection procedures: Using sample means to improve efficiency
Two-stage selection procedures have been widely studied and applied to determine appropriate sample sizes for selecting the best of k designs. However, standard “indifference-zone” procedures are derived with a statistically conservative least-favorable-configuration assumption. The Enhanced Two-Stage Selection (ETSS) is a procedure that takes into account not only the variance of samples but a...
متن کامل