RELIGION AND POLITICS IN EGYPT: THE ULEMA OF AL-AZHAR, RADICAL ISLAM, AND THE STATE (1952-94) A vast literature
نویسنده
چکیده
A vast literature has been produced since the 1980s on the emergence of Islamist movements in the Middle East. This literature offers different rationales for the emergence of new kinds of foes to the political regimes of the region. Filling the void left by the leftist opposition, the Islamist militants appeared around the 1970s as new political actors. They were expected neither by the state elites, which had initiated earlier modernizing political and social reforms, nor by political scientists who based their research on modernization-theory hypotheses. The former thought that their reform policies toward the religious institution would reinforce their control of the religious sphere, and the latter expected that secularization would accompany the modernization of society. The surprise brought by this new political phenomenon pushed observers to focus mainly on the Islamists and to overlook the role of the ulema, the specialists of the Islamic law, who were considered entirely submitted to the state. This article intends to supplement these descriptions by shedding light on the linkage between the structural change the ruling elites imposed on al-Azhar, the Egyptian religious institution, and the transformation of the political behavior of the people who belong to this institution, the ulema. The first part of this paper shows that the modernization of al-Azhar in 1961 has had unintended consequences. The declared aim of the reform was to integrate the ulema into what was considered to be the modernizing part of society. Instead, the most important and pervasive consequence of the reform was the emergence of a new political behavior among the ulema. I argue that if the nationalization of the institution was and remains resented by most of the ulema, the shape it took and the questions it raised at that time had long-term and unexpected consequences on the ulema's social and political identity. The core of my argument is the following: the ulema were forced to accommodate to overwhelming changes, but the Nasserist regime, through its "modernizing" reform, was also compelled to adjust to the ulema's state of mind and to elaborate a reform that was ambiguous in its essence. Therefore, the behavior of al-Azhar's religious scholars cannot be seen solely as a response to Nasser's policy toward the Egyptian religious
منابع مشابه
The Different Layers of Islam in Interaction with Politics: a Comparative Analysis of Iran, Saudi Arabia and Turkey
This study attempts to assess the different ways through which Islam as a religion can impact politics. In fact, the notion that is collectively labeled as Islam and its re-interpretation as an escalating presence of religion in politics in today's world has deep layers. To distinguish a variety of these layers, each with different characteristics, they should be defined, and the type of contri...
متن کاملThe Rise of Political Islam Can The Turkish Model Be Applied Successfully in Egypt ?
Although the parliamentary elections run in Egypt in December 2011January 2012 indicated that Egypt is witnessing an era of political or democratic transformation, they signified the rise of political Islam to authority; the rise which created a lot of debates and posed a lot of questions about the political and economic future of Egypt. The core of these debates circles around these questions:...
متن کاملIslam and Modernity: A Study of John Updike's Terrorist (2006)
The images of Muslims in media, literature and politics have been mostly black and white portrayals of a people alien to modernity, technology, civilization and progress. Since the end of the Cold War and the onset of deadly terrorist attacks in different areas of the world, especially in the United States, these representations show a palpable difference: Muslims are predominantly represented ...
متن کاملعرفان و سوررئالیسم از منظر زمینه های اجتماعی
There is no doubt that mental phenomena mainly exist by social circumstances. Social schools founders’ mental proportion with current circumstances in the society indicates the fact that social circumstances exist, foster and beak down worldviews and then destroy them or divert them from one direction to another direction. Islamic Mysticism was created within Islam, but at the influence of soci...
متن کاملتأثیر نگرش قدسی به سیاست بر روابط خارجی، در اندیشۀ اندیشمندان ایرانی
Holiness of politics as an attitude has been prevailed throughout the Iranian’s political history. Such a perspective enjoys some characteristics: believing in God, coordination between political and cosmic order, interrelation of religion and politics, and Divine light or chosen leader. Convincingly, foreign relations have been impressed by the belief. The current paper seeks for answer of th...
متن کامل