Grammaticality judgements, intuitions and corpora 175-015 Syntax
نویسنده
چکیده
The syntactician’s toolkit relies heavily on grammaticality judgements. Tests determining the structure of language often involve transforming a language fragment and then checking the grammaticality of the result. For example, distributional tests for constituency. However, determining grammaticality is not always a straightforward task. Tests for grammaticality have been characterized by two forms of evidence used. Native speaker intuitions have been the preferred evidence in the past fifty years of syntactic inquiry. On the other hand, frequency data obtained from corpora have developed an increased support base in recent times. In this essay, I review native speaker intuitions and corpus derived frequencies and their appropriateness as data for grammaticality testing. Finally considering how they may be used together to form a stronger empirical base of evidence for grammaticality.
منابع مشابه
Reading Sentences with a Late Closure Ambiguity: Does Semantic Information Help?
Stowe (1989) reported that semantic information eliminates garden paths in sentences with the direct-object vs. subject ambiguity, such as Even before the police stopped the driver was very frightened. Three experiments are presented which addressed some methodological problems in Stowe's study. Experiment 1, using a word-by-word, self-paced reading task with grammaticality judgements, manipula...
متن کاملThe Time Course of Grammaticality Judgment
-1INTRODUCTION Halfway through the twentieth century, linguistics underwent a major methodological shift, from distributional analysis of native-speaker speech (BloomÞeld, 1961), to the analysis of native-speaker intuitions about legal sentence types (Chomsky, 1957; for reviews, see Newmeyer, 1980; Sells, Shieber & Wasow, 1991). In most cases, the native speakers who furnish these intuitions ha...
متن کاملA Model-Theoretic Framework for Grammaticality Judgements
Although the observation of grammaticality judgements is well acknowledged, their formal representation faces problems of different kinds: linguistic, psycholinguistic, logical, computational. In this paper we focus on addressing some of the logical and computational aspects, relegating the linguistic and psycholinguistic ones in the parameter space. We introduce a model-theoretic interpretatio...
متن کاملAcceptability Prediction by Means of Grammaticality Quantification
We propose in this paper a method for quantifying sentence grammaticality. The approach based on Property Grammars, a constraint-based syntactic formalism, makes it possible to evaluate a grammaticality index for any kind of sentence, including ill-formed ones. We compare on a sample of sentences the grammaticality indices obtained from PG formalism and the acceptability judgements measured by ...
متن کاملLinguistic Intuitions Revisited
Why are linguistic intuitions good evidence for a grammar? In ‘Intuitions in Linguistics’ ([2006a]) and Ignorance of Language ([2006b]), I looked critically at some Chomskian answers and proposed another one. In this article, I respond to Fitzgerald’s ‘Linguistic Intuitions’ ([2010]), a sweeping critique of my position, and to Culbertson and Gross’ ‘Are Linguists Better Subjects?’ ([2009]), a c...
متن کامل