War and Democratization: Legality, Legitimacy and Effectiveness

Promotion öf democracy in post-war and post-conflict societies became a hot topic during the 1990s. External actors Iinked their peace-building efforts to the promotion of democracy. FoUl' modes of promotion of democracy by external actors can be distinguished: first , enforcing democratization by enduring post-war occupation (mode 1); second, restoring an elected government by military intervention (mode 2); third, intervening in on-going massacres and civil war with military forces ('humanitarian intervention') and thereby curbing the national sovereignty of those countries (mode 3); and fourth, forcing democracy on rogue states by 'democratic intervention', in other words, democracy through war (mode 4). In this special issue we consider the legality, legitimacy, and effectiveness of the foul' modes where the international community of states not only feit impelled to' engage in military humanitarian 01' peace-building missions but also in long-term stateand democracy-building. All cases analysed here suggest that embedding democratization in post-war and post-conflict societies entails a comprehensive agenda of political, social, and economic methods of peace-building. If external actors withdraw before the roots of democracy are deep enough and before democratic institutions are strong enough to stand alone, then the entire endeavoUl' may fai!.