Player-Compatible Equilibrium∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
We define Player-Compatible Equilibrium or “PCE,” which imposes cross-player restrictions on magnitudes of the players’ “trembles” onto different actions. These restrictions are inspired by the idea that trembles correspond to deliberate experiments by inexperienced agents who are unsure of the prevailing distribution of strategies in opponent populations. We show that PCE selects the “intuitive” equilibria in a number of examples where trembling-hand perfect equilibrium (Selten, 1975) and proper equilibrium (Myerson, 1978) have no bite. We also provide a learning-based microfoundation for PCE in some easy-to-analyze classes of games. Finally, we conduct a lab experiment based on one of our examples and verify PCE leads to better predictions than other equilibrium concepts. ∗We thank Dave Rand for useful conversations and comments. We are grateful to the staff and research assistants at Harvard Decision Science Laboratory, especially Alki Iliopoulou, Gabe Mansur, Christina Qiu, and Sylvie Stoloff. We thank National Science Foundation grant SES 1643517 for financial support. †Department of Economics, MIT. Email: [email protected] ‡Department of Economics, Harvard University. Email: [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Reputation and Distribution in a Gift Giving Game
The folk theorem allows a very unequal division between players. In nonrepeated experimental games with many equilibria, such as ultimatum, observed play involves a relatively equal division between players. In a two-player repeated game setting there is a simple intuition about this: a poor player has little to lose by deviating from his equilibrium strategy. So a rich player ought to be willi...
متن کاملFinite Stage Centipede Game and other Finite Two Player Dynamic Games with Bounded Rationality
Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium (SPNE), as a predictive theory, has been found to be inconsistent with experimental evidence in many dynamic games. This working paper introduces bounded rationality of varying degrees through a distribution of the types of each player in finite dynamic games, and checks if that rationalizes observed/“intuitive” behavior. Each of these types has a different degr...
متن کاملReputation with Long Run Players and Imperfect Observation
Previous work shows that reputation results may fail in repeated games between two long-run players with equal discount factors. We restrict attention to an infinitely repeated game where two players with equal discount factors play a simultaneous move stage game where actions of player 2 are imperfectly observed. The set of commitment types for player 1 is taken as any (countable) set of finit...
متن کاملRepresentation of Belief Hierarchies in Games with Incomplete Information
We consider two partition models to be compatible if they render the same set of hierarchies of beliefs over a given set of underlying uncertainties. A model is reduced if only one partition element corresponds to each hierarchy. We show how to generate all models in a compatible class from the reduced model by introducing a state-dependent correlating mechanism which reveals different informat...
متن کاملA Direct Reduction from k-Player to 2-Player Approximate Nash Equilibrium
We present a direct reduction from k-player games to 2-player games that preserves approximate Nash equilibrium. Previously, the computational equivalence of computing approximate Nash equilibrium in k-player and 2-player games was established via an indirect reduction. This included a sequence of works defining the complexity class PPAD, identifying complete problems for this class, showing th...
متن کامل