Advected Upstream Splitting Method for the Coupled Maxwell and Navier–Stokes Equations
نویسندگان
چکیده
s, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2004, p. 302.[27] Moeller, T., Keefer, D., Rhodes, R., Rooney, D., and Merkle, C.,“Comparison of Experimental and Computational Simulations Resultsof a Pusled PlasmaAccelerator,” 29th International Electric PropulsionConference, Princeton Univ., IEPC Paper 2005-008, Princeton, NJ,2005.[28] MacCormack, R., “Simulation of Hypersonic Flow Within a StrongMagnetic Field,” 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting andExhibit: Aerospace Sciences Meetings, AIAA Paper 2007-0397,Jan. 2007.[29] MacCormack, R., “Numerical Simulation of Aerodynamic FlowWithina Strong Magnetic Field with Hall Current and Ion Slip,” 38th AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference: Fluid Dynamics and CoLocated Conferences, AIAA Paper 2007-4370, June 2007.[30] MacCormack, R., “Solution of Maxwell’s Equations Coupled to theNavier–Stokes Equations,” 40th AIAA Plasmadynamics and LasersConference: Fluid Dynamics and Colocated Conferences, AIAA Paper2009-3911, June 2009.[31] Maccormack, R. W., “Flow Simulations Within Strong MagneticFields,” 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAAPaper 2008-1070, Jan. 2008, pp. 7–10.[32] MacCormack, R., “Non-Equilibrium Ionized Flow Simulations WithinStrong Electro-Magnetic Fields,” 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition: Aerospace Sciences Meetings, AIAA Paper 2010-0225,Jan. 2010.[33] MacCormack, R., “Solution of the Equations of Magneto-FluidDynamics with Chemical Reaction,” 41st Plasmadynamics and LasersConference: Fluid Dynamics and Colocated Conferences, AIAA Paper2010-4636, June 2010.[34] Gaitonde, D. V., and Poggie, J., “Implicit Technique for Three-Dimensional TurbulentMagnetoaerodynamics,”AIAA Journal, Vol. 41,No. 11, 2003, pp. 2179–2191.doi:10.2514/2.6810[35] Thompson, R., and Moeller, T. M., “Computer Simulations ofExothermic Propellants in a Microlaser Ablation Plasma Thruster,”Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2012, pp. 387–395.doi:10.2514/1.B34128[36] Roe, P. L., “Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, andDifference Schemes,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 43,No. 2,1981, pp. 357–372.doi:10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5[37] Thompson, R., Moeller, T., and Merkle, C., “A Strong ConservativeImplicit Riemann Solver for Coupled Navier–Stokes and Full MaxwellEquations,” 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition: Aerospace Sciences Meetings, AIAA Paper 2013-0210, Jan. 2013.[38] Thompson, R. J., “Fully Coupled Fluid and Electrodynamic Modelingof Plasmas: ATwo-Fluid Isomorphism and a Strong Conservative Flux-Coupled Finite Volume Framework,” Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of TennesseeKnoxville, Knoxville, TN, 2013.[39] Thompson, R. J., Wilson, A., Moeller, T. M., and Merkle, C. L., “AStrong Conservative Riemann Solver for the Solution of the CoupledMaxwell and Navier–Stokes Equations,” Journal of ComputationalPhysics, Vol. 258, Feb. 2014, pp. 431–450.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2013.10.041[40] Liou,M. S., and Steffen, C. J., “ANew Flux Splitting Scheme,” Journalof Computational Physics, Vol. 107, No. 1, 1993, pp. 23–39.doi:10.1006/jcph.1993.1122[41] Liou, M.-S., “The Evolution of AUSM Schemes,” Defence ScienceJournal, Vol. 60, No. 6, 2010, pp. 606–613.doi:10.14429/dsj[42] Scandaliato, A. L., and Liou, M.-S., “AUSM-Based High-OrderSolution for Euler Equations,” Communications in ComputationalPhysics, Vol. 12, No. 4, Oct. 2012, pp. 1096–1120.[43] Toro, E. F., andVazquez-Cendon,M.E., “Flux Splitting Schemes for theEuler Equations,” Computers and Fluids, Vol. 70, Nov. 2012, pp. 1–12.doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.08.023[44] Rooney, D., Moeller, T., Keefer, D., Rhodes, R., and Merkle, C.,“Experimental and Computer Simulation Studies of a Pulsed PlasmaAIAA Early Edition / THOMPSON ETAL.15 DownloadedbyUNIVERSITYOFTENNESSEE-TullahomaonNovember19,2014|http://arc.aiaa.org|DOI:10.2514/1.J053118 Accelerator,” AIAA Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA Paper 2007-5225, 2007.[45] Brio, M., and Wu, C. C., “An Upwind Differencing Scheme for theEquations of IdealMagnetohydrodynamics,” Journal of ComputationalPhysics, Vol. 75, No. 2, 1988, pp. 400–422.doi:10.1016/0021-9991(88)90120-9[46] Roe, P. L., and Balsara, D. S., “Notes on the Eigensystem ofMagnetohydrodynamics,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics,Vol. 56, No. 1, 1996, pp. 57–67.doi:10.1137/S003613999427084X[47] Balsara, D., and Spicer, D., “A Staggered Mesh Algorithm Using HighOrder Godunov Fluxes to Ensure Solenoidal Magnetic Fields inMagnetohydrodynamic Simulations,” Journal of ComputationalPhysics, Vol. 149, No. 2, 1999, pp. 270–292.doi:10.1006/jcph.1998.6153[48] Dai, W., “An Approximate Riemann Solver for Ideal Magnetohydro-dynamics,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 111, No. 2, 1994,pp. 354–372.doi:10.1006/jcph.1994.1069[49] Zachary, A. L., and Colellaz, P., “AHigher-Order GodunovMethod forthe Equations of Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics,” Journal of Computa-tional Physics, Vol. 99, No. 2, 1992, pp. 341–347.doi:10.1016/0021-9991(92)90213-I[50] Cargo, P., andGallice, G., “RoeMatrices for IdealMHDand SystematicConstruction of Roe Matrices for Systems of Conservation Laws,”Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 136, No. 2, 1997, pp. 446–466.doi:10.1006/jcph.1997.5773[51] Li, S., “An HLLC Riemann Solver for Magneto-Hydrodynamics,”Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 203, No. 1, 2005, pp. 344–357.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2004.08.020[52] Honkkila, V., and Janhunen, P., “HLLC Solver for Ideal RelativisticMHD,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 223, No. 2, 2007,pp. 643–656.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2006.09.027[53] Janhunen, P., “A Positive Conservative Method for Magnetohydrody-namics Based on HLL and Roe Methods,” Journal of ComputationalPhysics, Vol. 160, No. 2, 2000, pp. 649–661.doi:10.1006/jcph.2000.6479[54] Gurski, K. F., “An HLLC-Type Approximate Riemann Solver for IdealMagnetohydrodynamics,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing,Vol. 25, No. 6, 2004, pp. 2165–2187.doi:10.1137/S1064827502407962[55] MacCormack, R., “An Upwind Conservation Form Method forMagnetofluid Dynamics,” 30th Plasmadynamic and LasersConference: Fluid Dynamics and Colocated Conferences, AIAA Paper1999-3609, June 1999.[56] Jiang, G.-S., andWu, C.-c., “AHigh-Order {WENO} Finite DifferenceScheme for the Equations of Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics,” Journal ofComputational Physics, Vol. 150, No. 2, 1999, pp. 561–594.doi:10.1006/jcph.1999.6207[57] Agarwal, R., Augustinus, J., and Halt, D., “A Comparative Study ofAUSM and WPS Schemes for Fluid and MHD Flows,” 30th Plasmadynamic and Lasers Conference: Fluid Dynamics and Colocated Conferences, AIAA Paper 1999-3613, June 1999.[58] Han, S.-H., Lee, J.-I., and Kim, K. H., “Accurate and Robust PressureWeight Advection Upstream Splitting Method for Magnetohydrody-namics Equations,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 47, No. 4, 2009, pp. 970–981.doi:10.2514/1.39375[59] Shen, Y., Zha, G., and Huerta, M. A., “E-CUSP Scheme for theEquations of Ideal Magnetohydrodynamics with High Order WENOScheme,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 231, No. 19, 2012,pp. 6233–6247.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2012.04.015[60] Shumlak, U., and Loverich, J., “Approximate Riemann Solver for theTwo-FluidPlasmaModel,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 187,No. 2, 2003, pp. 620–638.doi:10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00151-7[61] Thompson, R., Moeller, T., and Merkle, C., “A Strong ConservationFormulation for Finite Volume Plasma Simulations with Displacementand Conduction Current,” 43rd AIAA Plasmadynamics and LasersConference, Fluid Dynamics and Co-Located Conferences, AIAAPaper 2012-3298, June 2012.[62] Thompson, R., Wilson, A., Moeller, T., and Merkle, C., “An AUSM-Based Algorithm for Solving the Coupled Navier–Stokes and MaxwellEquations,” 44th AIAAPlasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, AIAAPaper 2013-3002, June 2013.[63] Jahn, R. G., Physics of Electric Propulsion, Courier Dover Publ., NewYork, 2012, pp. 69–83.[64] Shang, J. S., and Gaitonde, D., “Characteristic-Based, Time-DependentMaxwell Equation Solvers on a General Curvilinear Frame,” AIAAJournal, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1995, pp. 491–498.doi:10.2514/3.12376[65] Shang, J. S., and Fithen, R.M., “AComparative Study of Characteristic-Based Algorithms for the Maxwell Equations,” Journal of Computa-tional Physics, Vol. 125, No. 2, 1996, pp. 378–394.doi:10.1006/jcph.1996.0100[66] Munz, C. D., Schneider, R., and Voss, U., “A Finite-VolumeMethod forthe Maxwell Equations in the Time Domain,” SIAM Journal onScientific Computing, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2000, pp. 449–475.doi:10.1137/S1064827596307890[67] Wesseling, P., Principles of Computational Fluid Dynamics, SpringerSeries in Computational Mathematics, Springer, New York, 2009,pp. 567–589.[68] Munz,C.D., Omnes, P., Schneider, R., Sonnendrucker, E., andVoss,U.,“Divergence Correction Techniques for Maxwell Solvers Based on aHyperbolicModel,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 161, No. 2,2000, pp. 484–511.doi:10.1006/jcph.2000.6507[69] Orszag, S., and Tang, C., “Small-Scale Structure of 2-DimensionalMagnetohydrodynamic Turbulence,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics,Vol. 90, Jan. 1979, pp. 129–143.doi:10.1017/S002211207900210X[70] Chandrasekhar, S., Hydrodynamics and Hydromagnetic Stability,Courier Dover Publ., New York, 2013, pp. 481–512.
منابع مشابه
A Modified Flux Vector Splitting Scheme for Flow Analysis in Shock Wave Laminar Boundary Layer Interactions
The present work introduces a modified scheme for the solution of compressible 2-D full Navier-Stokes equations, using Flux Vector Splitting method. As a result of this modification, numerical diffusion is reduced. The computer code which is developed based on this algorithm can be used easily and accurately to analyze complex flow fields with discontinuity in properties, in cases such as shock...
متن کاملA Modified Flux Vector Splitting Scheme for Flow Analysis in Shock Wave Laminar Boundary Layer Interactions
The present work introduces a modified scheme for the solution of compressible 2-D full Navier-Stokes equations, using Flux Vector Splitting method. As a result of this modification, numerical diffusion is reduced. The computer code which is developed based on this algorithm can be used easily and accurately to analyze complex flow fields with discontinuity in properties, in cases such as shock...
متن کاملMixed Large-Eddy Simulation Model for Turbulent Flows across Tube Bundles Using Parallel Coupled Multiblock NS Solver
In this study, turbulent flow around a tube bundle in non-orthogonal grid is simulated using the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) technique and parallelization of fully coupled Navier – Stokes (NS) equations. To model the small eddies, the Smagorinsky and a mixed model was used. This model represents the effect of dissipation and the grid-scale and subgrid-scale interactions. The fully coupled NS eq...
متن کاملMixed Large-Eddy Simulation Model for Turbulent Flows across Tube Bundles Using Parallel Coupled Multiblock NS Solver
In this study, turbulent flow around a tube bundle in non-orthogonal grid is simulated using the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) technique and parallelization of fully coupled Navier – Stokes (NS) equations. To model the small eddies, the Smagorinsky and a mixed model was used. This model represents the effect of dissipation and the grid-scale and subgrid-scale interactions. The fully coupled NS eq...
متن کاملUnconditional stability of a partitioned IMEX method for magnetohydrodynamic flows
Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flows are governed by Navier–Stokes equations coupled with Maxwell equations through coupling terms. We prove the unconditional stability of a partitioned method for the evolutionary full MHD equations, at high magnetic Reynolds number, written in the Elsässer variables. The method we analyze is a first-order onestep scheme, which consists of implicit discretization of...
متن کاملHigh Accuracy Method for Magnetohydrodynamics System in Elsässer Variables
The MHD flows are governed by the Navier-Stokes equations coupled with the Maxwell equations through coupling terms. We prove the unconditional stability of a partitioned method for the evolutionary full MHD equations, at high magnetic Reynolds number, in the Elsässer variables. The method we propose is a defect correction second order scheme, and entails the implicit discretization of the subp...
متن کامل