On stellated spheres and a tightness criterion for combinatorial manifolds

نویسندگان

  • Bhaskar Bagchi
  • Basudeb Datta
چکیده

We introduce the k-stellated spheres and consider the class Wk(d) of triangulated d-manifolds all whose vertex links are k-stellated, and its subclass W∗ k (d) consisting of the (k + 1)-neighbourly members of Wk(d). We introduce the mu-vector of any simplicial complex and show that, in the case of 2-neighbourly simplicial complexes, the mu-vector dominates the vector of its Betti numbers componentwise; the two vectors are equal precisely for tight simplicial complexes. We are able to estimate/compute certain alternating sums of the components of the mu-vector of any 2-neighbourly member of Wk(d) for d ≥ 2k. As one consequence of this theory, we prove a lower bound theorem for such triangulated manifolds, as well as determine the integral homology type of members of W∗ k (d) for d ≥ 2k + 2. As another application, we prove that, when d 6= 2k + 1, all members of W∗ k (d) are tight. We also characterize the tight members of W∗ k (2k + 1) in terms of their k Betti numbers. These results more or less answer a recent question of Effenberger, and also provide a uniform and conceptual tightness proof for all except two of the known tight triangulated manifolds. We also prove a lower bound theorem for triangulated manifolds in which the members of W1(d) provide the equality case. This generalises a result (the d = 4 case) due to Walkup and Kühnel. As a consequence, it is shown that every tight member of W1(d) is strongly minimal, thus providing substantial evidence in favour of a conjecture of Kühnel and Lutz asserting that tight triangulated manifolds should be strongly minimal. Mathematics Subject Classification (2010): 57Q15, 52B05.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

On stellated spheres, shellable balls, lower bounds and a combinatorial criterion for tightness

We introduce the k-stellated (combinatorial) spheres and compare and contrast them with kstacked (triangulated) spheres. It is shown that for d ≥ 2k, any k-stellated sphere of dimension d bounds a unique and canonically defined k-stacked ball. In parallel, any k-stacked polytopal sphere of dimension d ≥ 2k bounds a unique and canonically defined k-stacked (polytopal) ball, which answers a quest...

متن کامل

On k-stellated and k-stacked spheres

We introduce the class Σk(d) of k-stellated (combinatorial) spheres of dimension d (0 ≤ k ≤ d+1) and compare and contrast it with the class Sk(d) (0 ≤ k ≤ d) of k-stacked homology d-spheres. We have Σ1(d) = S1(d), and Σk(d) ⊆ Sk(d) for d ≥ 2k− 1. However, for each k ≥ 2 there are k-stacked spheres which are not k-stellated. For d ≤ 2k− 2, the existence of k-stellated spheres which are not k-sta...

متن کامل

Stacked polytopes and tight triangulations of manifolds

Tightness of a triangulated manifold is a topological condition, roughly meaning that any simplexwise linear embedding of the triangulation into Euclidean space is “as convex as possible”. It can thus be understood as a generalization of the concept of convexity. In even dimensions, super-neighborliness is known to be a purely combinatorial condition which implies the tightness of a triangulati...

متن کامل

Efficient Algorithms to Decide Tightness

Tightness is a generalisation of the notion of convexity: a space is tight if and only if it is “as convex as possible”, given its topological constraints. For a simplicial complex, deciding tightness has a straightforward exponential time algorithm, but more efficient methods to decide tightness are only known in the trivial setting of triangulated surfaces. In this article, we present a new p...

متن کامل

Constructing Combinatorial 4-manifolds

Every closed oriented PL 4-manifold is a branched cover of the 4-sphere branched over a PL-surface with finitely many singularities by Piergallini [Topology 34(3):497-508, 1995]. This generalizes a long standing result by Hilden and Montesinos to dimension four. Izmestiev and Joswig [Adv. Geom. 3(2):191-225, 2003] gave a combinatorial equivalent of the Hilden and Montesinos result, constructing...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Eur. J. Comb.

دوره 36  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014