In-Depth Review Hepatorenal Syndrome: Pathophysiology and Management

I n the late 19th century, reports by Frerichs (1861) and Flint (1863) noted an association among advanced liver disease, ascites, and oliguric renal failure in the absence of significant renal histologic changes (1). Almost 100 yr later, in a seminal article by Hecker and Sherlock (2), the pathogenesis of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) was unraveled. The authors demonstrated the lack of major renal histologic changes despite the severity of kidney failure, linked the deterioration in renal function to impairment of the systemic circulation, and concluded that the underlying mechanism of kidney failure is peripheral arterial vasodilation. On the basis of this hypothesis, their patients were treated with norepinephrine with dramatic but short-lived improvement in urine volume and without a significant change in serum creatinine or urea concentrations. The functional nature of HRS was confirmed further by the ability to transplant kidneys from patients with HRS and the normalization of renal function after liver transplantation (3,4). Subsequent studies by Epstein et al. (5) demonstrated without doubt that splanchnic and systemic vasodilation together with intense renal vasoconstriction is the pathophysiologic hallmark of HRS. However, despite improved understanding, the prognosis of HRS remained poor, and in the 1970s, the term “terminal functional renal failure” was synonymous with HRS (6). During the last 2 decades, knowledge of the pathogenesis and management of HRS has improved greatly. The present article provides an update on these recent developments.