Relative effectiveness of methionine hydroxy analog compared to DL-methionine in broiler chickens.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Two broiler experiments were conducted to assess the relative bioefficacy of liquid DL-Met hydroxy analog-free acid (MHA-FA) and DL-Met (DLM). Exponential regression analysis was used to determine biological efficacy based on body weight, feed conversion, and carcass responses to dietary Met source. In Trial 1, four graded inclusion levels of DLM and liquid MHA-FA (0.06, 0.12, 0.18, and 0.24%) were each added to a basal diet that met the nutrient and energy requirements of broiler chickens, with the exception of Met + Cys. In four additional treatments, diluted DLM (65%) was added at the same supplementation levels as pure DLM and liquid MHA-FA. In the 42-d trial, broilers responded significantly (P < 0.05) to the supplements. Regression analysis revealed that liquid MHA-FA was 68% (weight gain), 67% (feed conversion), 62% (carcass yield), and 64% (breast meat yield) as efficacious as pure DLM on an as-fed basis. Responses to liquid MHA-FA and diluted DLM were very similar at corresponding supplementation levels. Diluted DLM as an internal standard confirmed that exponential regression analysis was a statistically valid technique for determination of the relative efficacy of nutrient sources. In Trial 2, five graded inclusion levels of each DLM (0.040, 0.091, 0.152, 0.222, and 0.303%) and liquid MHA-FA (0.045, 0.102, 0.170, 0.250, and 0.350%) were added to a basal diet limiting in Met + Cys but adequate in all other nutrients and energy. Liquid MHA-FA was 72% (weight gain), 51% (feed conversion), 48% (carcass yield), and 60% (breast yield) as efficacious as DLM on a weight-for-weight basis.
منابع مشابه
Relative effectiveness of herbal methionine compared to DLmethionine on growth, performance and carcass responses basis in broiler chickens
BACKGROUND: The degree to which the amount of aningested nutrient is absorbed and available to the body is calledbioavailability. OBJECTIVES: Relative effectiveness of herbalmethionine (H-Met®) compared to DL-methionine (DL-Met)was investigated in this experiment. METHODS: Exponentialregression analysis was used to determine bioefficacy of H-Met®based on body weight gain, feed intake and feed c...
متن کاملBioavailability comparison between herbal methionine and DL-methionine on growth performance and immunocompetence basis in broiler chickens
BACKGROUND:Herbal methionine can be compared relative toDl-methionine with evaluation of bioavailability of this source ofmethionine. OBJECTIVES: An experiment was carried out todetermine the relative bioefficacy of herbal methionine (H-Met)®relative to DL-methionine (DL-Met) on performance criteria andimmunocompetence of Met sources in male broilers. Atotal of 160male broilers were fed a Met-d...
متن کاملBio-efficacy comparison of herbal-methionine and DL-methionine based on performance and blood parameters of broiler chickens
This study was conducted to compare the bio-efficacy of herbal methionine (H-Met) relative to DL-methionine (DL-Met) on 160 “Ross 308” broiler chickens. DL-Met and H-Met were added to the basal diet in eight experimental treatments with three and four concentrations respectively in starter, grower and finisher period. Blood parameters which were measured at 24 and 42 days of age consisted of: s...
متن کاملBiological Effectiveness of Methionine Hydroxy-analogue Calcium Salt in Relation to DL-Methionine in Broiler Chickens
Two feeding trials were conducted to assess the relative bioavailability (RBV) of methionine hydroxy analogue calcium salt (MHA-Ca) in comparison to DL-methionine (DL-Met). Male Ross 308 (1-38 days) and Cobb 500 chickens (1-42 days) were used in studies 1 and 2, respectively. Experimental diets based on wheat and soybean meal or sorghum and soybean meal were fed during three phases. In both exp...
متن کاملIron Nanoparticles and Methionine Hydroxy Analogue Chelate in ovo Feeding of Broiler Chickens
The 440 fertile eggs, in a completely randomized design were divided into 11 treatments with four replicates and 10 eggs per each replicate. Treatments including: (T1; control; without injection), (T2; injected with 0.3 ml saline 9.0%; sham control), (T3, T4 and T5) 25, 75, 125 ppm Fe-Nano, (T6, T7 and T8) 50, 100, 150 ppm Fe-Nano-Alimet chelate, (T9, T10 and T11) 50, 100, 150 ppm Fe-Aliment ch...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Poultry science
دوره 81 6 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002