Overcon fi dence , Morale and Wage - Setting Policies ∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
Psychologists have consistently documented people’s tendency to be overconfident about their own ability. We interpret workers’ confidence in their own skills as their morale, and investigate the implication of worker overconfidence on the firm’s optimal wage-setting policies. In our model, a wage contract both provides incentives and conveys to the worker the firm’s opinion about her ability, hence affects her morale. We provide conditions for the non-differentiation wage policy − the firm offers the same contract to all workers irrespective of its perceptions about their relative abilities − to be superior to the differentiation wage policy. In numerical examples, we show that, first, worker overconfidence is a necessary condition for the firm to prefer no wage differentiation so as to preserve some workers’ morale; second, the non-differentiation wage policy will itself breed more worker overconfidence, thus “overconfidence begets overconfidence;” and third, wage compression is more likely when aggregate productivity is low.
منابع مشابه
Corporate Financial Policies With Overcondent Managers
We argue that individual characteristics of managers can explain capital structure decisions like debt conservatism and pecking-order nancing choices. Moreover, they can explain cross-sectional variation in these decisions despite identical rm characteristics. We link the reluctance of (some) managers to access external capital markets, and in particular equity markets, to managerial overcon ...
متن کاملMorale hazard
We interpret workers’ confidence in their own skills as their morale, and investigate the implication of worker overconfidence on the firm’s optimal wage-setting policies. In our model, wage contracts both provide incentives and affect worker morale, by revealing private information of the firm about worker skills. We provide conditions for the non-differentiation wage policy to be profit-maxim...
متن کاملDistinguishing Overcondence from Rational Best-Response in Markets1
This paper studies the causal e¤ect of individualsovercon dence and bounded rationality on asset markets. To do that, we combine a new market mechanism with an experimental design, where (1) playersinteraction is centered on the inferences they make about each others information, (2) overcon dence in private information is controlled by the experimenter (i.e., used as a treatment), and (3) n...
متن کاملDistinguishing Bounded Rationality from Overcondence in Financial Markets - Theory and Experimental Results1
This paper studies the causal e¤ect of individualsovercon dence and bounded rationality on asset markets. To do that, we combine a new market mechanism with an experimental design, where (1) playersinteraction is centered on the inferences they make about each othersinformation, (2) overcon dence in private information is controlled by the experimenter (i.e., used as a treatment), and (3) na...
متن کاملPolarization and Pandering in Common-value Elections
Standard election models robustly predict that candidates should adopt moderate policies, especially if they value winning o¢ ce, and that this is good for voter welfare. Empirical polarization is therefore both inexplicable and troubling. This paper shows that if voter di¤erences reect beliefs about an underlying truth variable, rather than idiosyncratic preferences, then polarization is the ...
متن کامل