The Failing Firm Defense versus Subsidies in Declining Markets

نویسندگان

  • Jan Bouckaert
  • Peter Kort
  • Stefka Petrova
چکیده

This paper studies the strategic and welfare effects of the “failing firm defense” in declining markets with differentiated products. All solvent firms prefer a clearing of the rescue merger to the failing firm exiting the market. The failing firm defense increases consumer surplus, since the benefit from maintained product variety outweighs the cost of higher prices that result from the merger. Importantly, we also find that, in terms of total welfare, temporary subsidies are superior to the failing firm defense.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Export Enhancement Program ' s Influence on Finn - Level Competition in International Markets

The U.S. government awarded export subsidies to agribusiness firms through the Export Enhancement Program (EEP). This study analyzes (a) whether the subsidies promoted new firm market entry and (b) whether firm characteristics influenced program participation. Trade in three commodities, poultry, wheat, and wheat flour, was analyzed using firm-level data. It was found that new firm market entry...

متن کامل

Exit from Two Declining Markets with Technological Complementarities1

We study the exit behavior of a firm in multiple declining markets with an extension of Ghemawat and Nalebuff (1985) to a multimarket environment. We find that the multimarket firms pool their commitment of staying in individual markets when there are technological complementarities between markets, and thereby, may change the credibility of the threat of staying in the war of attrition. The la...

متن کامل

Capital Structure under Changing Uncertainty

We explain the puzzle of falling firm leverage during the period of decreasing aggregate volatility from 1970 – 2010 with a simultaneous increase in firm level volatility and varying degrees of firm access to public debt markets. By incorporating friction between public and private debt, a structural model where firms make financing policy decisions in presence of uncertainty can explain a sign...

متن کامل

The Impact of Payroll Tax Reductions on Employment and Wages: A Natural Experiment Using Firm Level Data

Past evidence on the incidence of payroll tax subsidies on employment and wages for disadvantaged workers has been quite mixed. Therefore, this paper makes use of a unique panel of firm level data and a natural experiment to analyze the incidence of wage subsidies on full-time manual workers and pre-tax wages. Using a number of straightforward evaluation estimators we find that employment subsi...

متن کامل

A Model of Optimal Government Bailouts

We analyze incentive-efficient government bailouts within a canonical model of intra-firm moral hazard. Bailouts exacerbate the moral hazard of firms and managers in two ways. First, they make them less averse to failing. Second, the taxes to fund bailouts dampen their incentives. Nevertheless, if third-party externalities from keeping the firm alive are strong, bailouts can improve welfare. Ou...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010