Identification and Reconciliation of Semantic Conflicts Using Metadata
نویسندگان
چکیده
Semantic reconciliation is an important step in determining logical connectivity between a data source (database) and a data receiver (application). Semantic reconciliation is used to determine if the semantics of the data provided by the source is meaningful to the receiver. In this paper we describe an automatic method to establish such semantic agreement through the use of metadata. This work examines the effect of changing data semantics, these changes may occur at the source of the data or they may be changes in the data semantic specifications of the application. Methods are described for detecting these changes and for determining if the database can supply meaningful data to the application. These methods also can be used for semantic reconciliation where an application depends on multiple data sources and for schema integration in heterogeneous database systems.
منابع مشابه
Working Paper Alfred P. Sloan School of Management a Metadata Approach to Resolving Semantic Conflicts a Metadata Approach to Resolving Semantic Conflicts a Metadata Approach to Resolving Semantic Conflicts
Semantic reconciliation is an important step in determining logical connectivity between a data source (databcise) and a data receiver (application). Semantic reconciliation is used to determine if the semantics of the data provided by the source is meaningful to the receiver. In this paper we describe a rule-bzised approach to semantic specification and demonstrate how this specification can b...
متن کاملA Metadata Approach to Resolving Semantic Conflicts
Semantic reconciliation is an important step in determining logical connectivity between a data source (database) and a data receiver (application). Semantic reconciliation is used to determine if the semantics of the data provided by the source is meaningful to the receiver. In this paper we describe a rule-based approach to semantic specification and demonstrate how this specification can be ...
متن کاملSemantic Information in Geo-Ontologies: Extraction, Comparison, and Reconciliation
A crucial issue during semantic integration of different geographic metadata sources is category comparison and reconciliation. We focus on the development of a framework for identification and resolution of semantic heterogeneity between geographic categories. The framework is divided in three processes: extraction, comparison and reconciliation. The first process performs semantic information...
متن کاملDiscovering and Reconciling Semantic Conflicts: A Data Mining Perspective
Current approaches to semantic interoperability require human intervention in detecting potential conflicts and in defining how those conflicts may be resolved. This is a major impedance to achieving "logical connectivity", especially when the number of disparate sources is large. In this paper, we demonstrate that the detection and reconciliation of semantic conflicts can be automated using to...
متن کاملبررسی واکنش موتورهای کاوش وب به پیشینههای فرادادهای مبتنی برروش ترکیبی دادههای خرد و روش دادههای پیوندی
The purpose of this research was to find out the reaction of Web Search Engines to Metadata records created based on the combined method of Rich Snippets and Linked Data. 200 metadata records in two groups (100 records as the control group with the normal structure and, 100 records created based on microdata and implemented in RDF/XML as experimental group) extracted from the information gatewa...
متن کامل