Maximizing Participation Through Campaign Finance Regulation: A Cap and Trade Mechanism for Political Money

نویسنده

  • William J. Rinner
چکیده

This Article attempts to reroute a burgeoning area of campaign finance scholarship and reform. Though many previous proposals have enshrined liberty or equality as the sole animating value to pursue through doctrinal and political means, few have considered the impact of campaign finance regulation on citizen participation. Those that have proposed participation as a goal often remain tied to unworkable or self-defeating notions of equality. In building an alternative model of maximizing participation, this Article rejects the premise that direct political action such as volunteering embodies a superior form of participation to contributions, but recognizes the externalities that the latter form may produce. It proposes a new mechanism for reform: a cap and trade policy in which citizens can increase their rights to contribute to political candidates or parties based by purchasing permits from other contributors. Derived from proposals to regulate pollution in environmental economics, this mechanism serves as a helpful alternative to ineffective and inefficient contribution limits.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Campaign Finance Regulation: Faulty Assumptions and Undemocratic Consequences

Efforts to limit political contributions and spending are extremely popular. Yet there is no serious evidence that campaign finance regulation has achieved or will achieve its goals of reducing the influence of money, opening up the political system, and lowering the cost of campaigns. Indeed, since the 1974 amendments to the Federal Election Campaign Act, spending has risen sharply, the number...

متن کامل

False Campaign Speech and the First Amendment

Although campaign reformers may believe otherwise, it is not only the money in campaigns that is problematic. Campaign speech can also threaten the integrity of the electoral process. It can be misleading, manipulative, offensive, defamatory, and, in the case of judicial campaigns, unethical. It can distort the issues, distract the voters from making informed decisions, inhibit voter turnout, a...

متن کامل

Predicting Political Ideology Using Campaign Finance Data

Public interest has become increasingly focused on the role of money in politics. Specifically, the Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court ruling maintained the legality of unrestricted political expenditures by corporate and union entities. As a result, there has been a proliferation of super PAC, or ‘political action committee’, organizations. While these organizations are not permitted to make...

متن کامل

Campaign Finance "Reform" Proposals: A First Amendment Analysis

Current proposals to regulate campaign finance practices cannot survive the kind of scrutiny that the First Amendment requires. This study demonstrates that the ban on political action committees, the PAC ban fallback provisions, the "voluntary" spending limits, the restrictions on soft money, the regulation of issue advocacy, and the proposals to expand the enforcement powers for the Federal E...

متن کامل

Competing for the Attention of Decision Makers

A decision maker (DM) prefers to allocate a limited number of prizes to the “highest-quality” agents. Although the DM is initially uniformed about quality, she can learn about quality through a review process before awarding prizes. Due to time constraints, however, the DM is unable to review all agents before making a decision. The method by which the DM allocates her limited attention affects...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013