Risk Adjustment of Health Plan Payments to Correct Inefficient Plan Choice from Adverse Selection
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper develops and implements a statistical methodology to account for the equilibrium effects (aka adverse selection) in design of risk adjustment formula in health insurance markets. Our setting is modeled on the situation in Medicare and the new state Exchanges where individuals sort themselves between a discrete set of plan types (here, two). Our “Silver” and “Gold” plans have fixed characteristics, as in the well-known research on selection and efficiency by Einav and Finkelstein (EF). We build on the EF model in several respects, including by showing that risk adjustment can be used to achieve the premiums that will lead to efficient sorting. The target risk adjustment weights can be found by use of constrained regressions, where the constraints in the estimation are conditions on premiums that should be satisfied in equilibrium. We illustrate implementation of the method with data from seven years of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Jacob Glazer Department of Economics Warwick University and Faculty of Management Tel Aviv University [email protected] Thomas G. McGuire Department of Health Care Policy Harvard Medical School 180 Longwood Avenue Boston, MA 02115 and NBER [email protected] Julie Shi Harvard Medical School [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Optimal Risk Adjustment in Markets with Adverse Selection: An Application to Managed Care
It is well known that adverse selection causes distortions in contracts in markets with asymmetric information. Taxing inefficient contracts and subsidizing the efficient ones can improve market outcomes (Bruce C. Greenwald and Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1986), although regulators rarely seem to implement tax and subsidy schemes with adverse-selection motives in mind. Contracts are often complex and "...
متن کاملUpcoding or Selection? Evidence from Medicare on Squishy Risk Adjustment⇤
Risk adjustment is commonly used in health insurance markets to deal with problems of adverse selection and cream skimming by compensating health plans for insuring consumers whose diagnoses imply high expected costs. However, in all real world risk adjustment systems, insurers themselves report the diagnoses that determine enrollee risk scores and ultimately insurer payments. If risk scores ar...
متن کاملIntegrating risk adjustment and enrollee premiums in health plan payment.
In two important health policy contexts - private plans in Medicare and the new state-run "Exchanges" created as part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) - plan payments come from two sources: risk-adjusted payments from a Regulator and premiums charged to individual enrollees. This paper derives principles for integrating risk-adjusted payments and premium policy in individual health insurance ma...
متن کاملModified Capitation and Treatment Incentives for End Stage Renal Disease
This study developed a modified capitation payment method for the Medicare end stage renal disease (ESRD) program designed to support appropriate treatment choices and protect health plans from undue financial risk. The payment method consists of risk-adjusted monthly capitated payments for individuals on dialysis or with functioning kidney grafts, lump sum event payments for expected increment...
متن کاملDoes Risk Adjustment Reduce Selection in the Private Health Insurance Market? New Evidence from the Medicare Advantage Program
Views expressed here are those of the authors and not of the institutions with which they are affiliated. Abstract Roughly 25 percent of Medicare beneficiaries are enrolled in a private Medicare Advantage plan, a fraction that has been growing steadily in recent years. Because these plans are " at risk " for the cost of their enrollees' care, they have an incentive to attract and retain differe...
متن کامل