Propensity-matched comparison between Direct Flow Medical, Medtronic Corevalve, and Edwards Sapien XT prostheses: Device success, thirty-day safety, and mortality.

نویسندگان

  • Yuan Zhang
  • Stylianos A Pyxaras
  • Alexander Wolf
  • Thomas Schmitz
  • Christoph K Naber
چکیده

AIMS To compare 30-day performance of three different type of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) prosthesis: Direct Flow Medical (DFM), Medtronic Corevalve (MCV), and Edwards Sapien XT (ES). METHODS AND RESULTS Forty consecutive patients treated with DFM for severe aortic stenosis were matched to an equal sample of patients undergoing TAVI with MCV and ES (1:1:1 propensity score-matching). Primary end-point was 30-day safety, defined according to the valve academic research consortium (VARC-2) criteria. Secondary end-points were: (i) immediate post-TAVI transaortic gradient reduction, (ii) device success, and (iii) 30-day mortality. Patients treated with DFM had higher 30-day safety rate compared to MCV and ES (respectively: 95.0% vs. 67.5% vs. 82.5%; P=0.006). Immediate post-TAVI, transaortic gradient reduction was similar for DFM, MCV, and ES subgroups (respectively: 8.3 ± 5.2 mm Hg vs. 5.3 ± 3.7 mm Hg vs. 5.6 ± 5.1 mm Hg; P=0.15); likewise, device success did not differ significantly (respectively: 100% vs. 92.5% vs. 92.5%; P=0.19). Mortality rates were also similar (respectively: 0% vs. 7.5% vs. 7.5%; P=0.190). In the pooled binary logistic regression analysis, blood transfusion was associated to 30-day safety (HR 0.156, 95% CI 0.049-0.500, P=0.002), while a significant trend was observed for the vascular closure device type (favoring Proglide vs. Prostar: HR 0.239, 95% CI 0.049-1.160, P=0.076). CONCLUSIONS In high-risk patients with aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI, device success and short-term mortality were comparable between DFM, MCV, and ES. In contrast, the 30-day VARC-defined safety primary end-point was met significantly more frequently in patients treated with DFM. This result was mainly driven by differences in major vascular complications, associated to differences in vascular closure devices between the different valve subgroups.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Transaortic aortic valve replacement using the Edwards Sapien-XT Valve and the Medtronic CoreValve: initial experience.

INTRODUCTION Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now an established treatment for certain patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). However, as the number of patients screened for TAVR increases, many are found to have absolutely no option for peripheral artery access. Transaortic valve replacement (TAoVR) has been proposed as a new alternative route in patients deemed unsui...

متن کامل

Prospective analysis of 30-day safety and performance of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation with Edwards SAPIEN XT versus SAPIEN prostheses.

BACKGROUND A new generation of balloon-expandable valves (e.g. Edwards SAPIEN XT) enables the use of a decreased sheath size using the NovaFlex™ delivery system for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, there are few data analysing the efficacy and safety of this new prosthesis. AIMS To evaluate periprocedural and 30-day clinical outcomes using the Edwards SAPI...

متن کامل

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current principles of patient and technique selection and future perspectives.

Surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the conventional treatment for severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, a high operative mortality of 7% to 10% is well recognized in high-risk groups.1,2 Risk of AVR is increased by a number of factors, including increasing age, and comorbidities, such as heart failure, respiratory and renal disease, prior cardiac surgery, and need for concomitant corona...

متن کامل

Contemporary Reviews in Interventional Cardiology Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Current Principles of Patient and Technique Selection and Future Perspectives

Surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the conventional treatment for severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, a high operative mortality of 7% to 10% is well recognized in high-risk groups.1,2 Risk of AVR is increased by a number of factors, including increasing age, and comorbidities, such as heart failure, respiratory and renal disease, prior cardiac surgery, and need for concomitant corona...

متن کامل

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: is anatomy still the limiting factor?

INTRODUCTION Despite rapid advances in transcatheter aortic valve prostheses, anatomical constraints remain that can limit access to this treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis. The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of patients anatomically suitable for this technique using the different devices and approaches available. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 14...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions

دوره 85 7  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015