Facilitating Issue Categorization & Analysis in Rulemaking
نویسندگان
چکیده
One task common to all notice-and-comment rulemaking is identifying substantive claims and arguments made in the comments by stakeholders and other members of the public. Extracting and summarizing this material may be helpful to internal decisionmaking; to produce the legally required public explanation of the final rule, it is essential. When comments are lengthy or numerous, natural language processing and machine learning techniques can help the rulewriter work more quickly and comprehensively. Even when a smaller volume of comment material is received, the ability to annotate relevant portions and store information about them in a way that permits retrieval and generation of reports can be useful to the agency, especially over time. We describe a prototype application for these purposes. The Workspace for Issue Categorization and Analysis (WICA) allows the rulewriter to create a list of relevant substantive categories and assign them to marked portions of comment text. She can then retrieve all instances of a given issue within the comment pool. Preliminary results of experiments that apply text categorization and active learning methods to comment sets suggest that these techniques can facilitate the marking and category assignment process in lengthy or numerous comment sets. WICA will incorporate these techniques. Other possible applications of WICA within the rulemaking process are discussed.
منابع مشابه
Active learning for e-rulemaking: public comment categorization
We address the e-rulemaking problem of reducing the manual labor required to analyze public comment sets. In current and previous work, for example, text categorization techniques have been used to speed up the comment analysis phase of e-rulemaking — by classifying sentences automatically, according to the rule-specific issues [2] or general topics that they address[7, 8]. Manually annotated d...
متن کاملA study in rule-specific issue categorization for e-rulemaking
We address the e-rulemaking problem of categorizing public comments according to the issues that they address. In contrast to previous text categorization research in e-rulemaking [5, 6], and in an attempt to more closely duplicate the comment analysis process in federal agencies, we employ a set of rule-specific categories, each of which corresponds to a significant issue raised in the comment...
متن کاملDigital Government and E-Rulemaking: New Directions for Technology and Regulation
Each year hundreds of federal regulatory agencies issue more than 4,000 new regulations. Before adopting a new regulation, agencies must publish a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register and allow an opportunity for the public to comment on the proposed rule. They also need to complete scientific, engineering, and economic analyses, as well as respond to comments submitted by outs...
متن کاملAn eRulemaking Corpus: Identifying Substantive Issues in Public Comments
We describe the creation of a corpus that supports a real-world hierarchical text categorization task in the domain of electronic rulemaking (eRulemaking). Features of the task and of the eRulemaking domain engender both a non-traditional text categorization corpus and a correspondingly difficult machine learning task. Interannotator agreement results are presented for a group of six annotators...
متن کاملAdministrative Rulemaking: An Old and Emerging Literature
Rulemaking is the most important way in which bureaucracy creates policy. In some respects, it rivals the even legislative process in its significance as a form of governmental output. Although rulemaking was long overlooked in the policy sciences, students of government and public administration have begun to redress this neglect as part of a more general interest in formal institutions. In so...
متن کامل