Rise and Decline of Social Capital Excess Co-operation in the One-Shot Prisoner's Dilemma Game
نویسندگان
چکیده
In order to explain excess co-operation in the one-shot prisoner's dilemma game, we first question the standard assumption of stable and selfish preferences by introducing the concept of social capital. This analysis leads to a model that explains excess co-operation through an accumulation of social capital. We allow preferences and norms to change over time and hence endogenise them. Our results depend on individuals being able to acquire enough information to allow them to ascertain the social norm that fellow individuals subscribe to. However, our results do not depend on any assumptions about group size and no ostracism is required to generate co-operation. Our model gives three hypotheses about the emergence and stability of social capital and co-operation in society. First, neither unconditional cooperation nor universal defection is stable; second, for co-operation to be stable some individuals must be reciprocal in nature; third, we identify a 'rise and decline of social capital' which gives a cyclical pattern of co-operation in society. These findings may form the basis for future theoretical and empirical research. JEL classification: A12, C71, D23, D60, D70, Z13.
منابع مشابه
Heuristics guide the implementation of social preferences in one-shot Prisoner's Dilemma experiments
Cooperation in one-shot anonymous interactions is a widely documented aspect of human behaviour. Here we shed light on the motivations behind this behaviour by experimentally exploring cooperation in a one-shot continuous-strategy Prisoner's Dilemma (i.e. one-shot two-player Public Goods Game). We examine the distribution of cooperation amounts, and how that distribution varies based on the ben...
متن کاملSpinning Works: Strategy Framing in the One-Shot Prisoner’s Dilemma Game
The one-shot prisoner’s dilemma game has a unique dominance-solvable equilibrium. While others have studied framing some aspects of the game under laboratory conditions, the effects of non-neutral strategy labels has received significantly less study. In this experiment, I compare the effects of non-neutral strategy labels to baseline conditions, under both complete and incomplete information c...
متن کاملA non-cooperative Pareto-efficient solution to a single-shot Prisoner's Dilemma
The Prisoner’s Dilemma is a simple model that captures the essential contradiction between individual rationality and global rationality. Although the one-shot Prisoner’s Dilemma is usually viewed simple, in this paper we will categorize it into five different types. For the type-4 Prisoner’s Dilemma game, we will propose a selfenforcing algorithmic model to help non-cooperative agents obtain P...
متن کاملEfficiency in evolutionary games: Darwin, Nash and the secret handshake.
This paper considers any evolutionary game possessing several evolutionarily stable strategies, or ESSs, with differing payoffs. A mutant is introduced which will "destroy" any ESS which yields a lower payoff than another. This mutant possesses a costless signal and also conditions on the presence of this signal in each opponent. The mutant then can protect itself against a population playing a...
متن کاملThe emergence of commitments and cooperation
Our results suggest that human specialized capacity for commitment, which might have been shaped by natural selection, consists in a capacity for managing to impose a high cost of punishment at a relatively small cost. References. [1] Nesse. Evolution and the Capacity for Commitment. Russell Sage Foundation, 2001. [2] Axelrod. The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, 1984. [3] Han.et.al. Inte...
متن کامل