Quality indicators for primary care mental health services.

نویسندگان

  • T Shield
  • S Campbell
  • A Rogers
  • A Worrall
  • C Chew-Graham
  • L Gask
چکیده

OBJECTIVES To identify a generic set of face valid quality indicators for primary care mental health services which reflect a multi-stakeholder perspective and can be used for facilitating quality improvement. DESIGN Modified two-round postal Delphi questionnaire. SETTING Geographical spread across Great Britain. PARTICIPANTS One hundred and fifteen panellists representing 11 different stakeholder groups within primary care mental health services (clinical psychologist, health and social care commissioner, community psychiatric nurse, counsellor, general practitioner, practice nurse/district nurse/health visitor, psychiatrist, social worker, carer, patient and voluntary organisations). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Face validity (median rating of 8 or 9 on a nine point scale with agreement by all panels) for assessing quality of care. RESULTS A maximum of 334 indicators were rated by panels in the second round; 26% were rated valid by all panels. These indicators were categorised into 21 aspects of care, 11 relating to general practices and 10 relating to health authorities or primary care groups/trusts. There was variation in the total number of indicators rated valid across the different panels. Overall, GPs rated the lowest number of indicators as valid (41%, n=138) and carers rated the highest number valid (91%, n=304). CONCLUSIONS The quality indicators represent consensus among key stakeholder groups in defining quality of care within primary care mental health services. These indicators could provide a guide for primary care organisations embarking on quality improvement initiatives in mental health care when addressing national targets and standards relating to primary care set out in the National Service Framework for Mental Health for England. Although many of the indicators relate to parochial issues in UK service delivery, the methodology used in the development of the indicators could be applied in other settings to produce locally relevant indicators.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Quality indicators for the referral process from primary to specialised mental health care: an explorative study in accordance with the RAND appropriateness method

BACKGROUND Communication between involved parties is essential to ensure coordinated and safe health care delivery. However, existing literature reveals that the information relayed in the referral process is seen as insufficient by the receivers. It is unknown how this insufficiency affects the quality of care, and valid performance measures to explore it are lacking. The aim of the present st...

متن کامل

How do stakeholder groups vary in a Delphi technique about primary mental health care and what factors influence their ratings?

BACKGROUND While mental health is a core part of primary care, there are few validated quality measures and little relevant internationally published research. Consensus panel methods are a useful means of developing quality measures where evidence is sparse and/or opinions are diverse. However, little is known about the dynamics of consensus techniques and the factors that influence the judgem...

متن کامل

Validation of Primary Health Care Governance Model of Iran Using the Delphi Method

Validation of Primary Health Care Governance Model of Iran Using the Delphi Method Jaafarsadegh Tabrizi1, Raana Gholamzadeh Nikjoo2* 1MD, Phd, Department of Health policy and Management, Health Services Management Research Center, Faculty of Management and Medical Informatic, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2Phd, Department of Health Policy and Management, Iranian center of excellence in...

متن کامل

Monitoring and assessing the quality of care for youth: developing an audit tool using an expert consensus approach

BACKGROUND The mental health needs of young people are often inadequately met by health services. Quality improvement approaches provide a framework for measuring, assessing and improving the quality of healthcare. However, a lack of performance standards and measurement tools are an impediment to their implementation. This paper reports on the initial stages of development of a clinical audit ...

متن کامل

The development of quality indicators in mental healthcare: a discrete choice experiment

BACKGROUND Health care regulatory agencies perform audits or inspections to judge the quality and safety of health care. This judgment is based on the assessment of a large set of health care indicators as accepted by the profession. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the influence of these indicators and whether a smaller number would be sufficient for a quality assessment or audit pr...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Quality & safety in health care

دوره 12 2  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003