Running head: IMC EFECTS ON NON-DIFFERENTATION AND GRICEAN NORMS 1 It’s a Trap! The Influence of Instrumental Manipulation Checks on Response Non- Differentiation and Gricean Norm Effects
نویسندگان
چکیده
The instructional manipulation check (IMC) is a methodological tool designed to measure whether participants read the instructions in a survey, and thus, it is frequently used in online studies to identify inattentive participants. However, research on survey design has suggested that participants can infer intentions from prior questions, affecting responses to later questions. As the IMC tells participants of a communicative context wherein the experimenter intends to trick participants into giving wrong answers, this study assessed whether the simple inclusion of an IMC could lead to additional cognitive processing that subsequently reduced participants’ satisficing behaviors (Study 1), while increasing classic Gricean norm effects (Study 2). The results showed that the IMC did not affect participants’ satisficing behaviors or their responses to several of the Gricean norm effect measures, with one exception. Implications and future research areas are discussed.
منابع مشابه
Scalar Implicatures: Exhaustivity and Gricean Reasoning
This paper shows that both scalar implicatures and exhaustification of answers can be understood as the outcome of a pragmatic reasoning based on Gricean maxims. I offer a formalization of the Gricean reasoning that solves the problems (cf. Chierchia 2001) faced by standard neo-Gricean accounts. I further show that positive and non-positive answers pattern very differently, in a way that can be...
متن کاملDifferent Kinds of Pragmatic Factors Explain Failures of Default-to-Stereotype Inferences
Connolly, Fodor, Gleitman, and Gleitman (2007) present theoretical and empirical evidence against the Default-to-Stereotype (in short: DS) inference and argue that prototype theories of concepts predict (DS)-inferences. Hence, they conclude that prototype theories are inadequate. Jönsson and Hampton (2008) and Hampton, Jönsson, and Passanisi (2009) argue that (1) prototype theories do in genera...
متن کاملConversational inferences: the hard way and the easy way
This paper proposes a general theory of conversational inferences which distinguishes two kinds of inferences: the hard way and the easy way. The theory accounts for a wider range of non-literal utterance meanings than Gricean and relevance theories and is motivated by the types of utterances in which the hearer fails to infer non-
متن کاملAre Interlocutors as Sensitive to Over-informativeness as they are to Under-informativeness?
Research by Engelhardt, Bailey and Ferreira (2006) suggests that speakers avoid under-informativeness and listeners penalise it, but that neither of these behaviours apply to overinformativeness. We argue that what may appear as lack of sensitivity to over-informativeness is in fact preference for information that, even though it is not contributing to the unique identification of a referent, i...
متن کاملRedundant A rmation, Deliberation and Discourse
One of the fruits of the Gricean program is the distinction between those truth-conditional aspects of the meaning of utterances that are part of semantics proper, entailments, and those non-logical `pragmatic' aspects of the meaning of an utterance such as conversational implicatures. Thus in 1, the speaker asserts that Kim ate some of the cookies, but may intend to communicate in fact that Ki...
متن کامل