Abductive Consequence Relations

نویسندگان

  • Jorge Lobo
  • Carlos Uzcátegui
چکیده

In this paper we present a systematic study of abductive consequence relations. We show that a monotone abductive consequence relation satisses the properties of a cumulative monotonic system as deened by Kraus, Lehmann and Magidor when the disjunction of all abductive explanations is the explanation used to justify the observations. We also show that, in general, for this class of abductive consequence relations the Or rule does not hold. We present an example that shows that when there are preferences between diierent abductive explanations monotonicity does not hold. We show that non-monotonic abductive systems preserve a partial version of rational monotonicity and in fact are very similar to rational relations. We also present semantic characterizations of both monotonic and non-monotonic abductive systems in terms of cumulative models as deened by Kraus, Lehmann and Magidor.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Rationality Postulates for Induction

I study the process of inductive hypothesis formation from two perspectives: finding general rules that explain given specific evidence, and finding general rules that are confirmed by the evidence. Both forms of hypothesis formation are axiomatised on the metalevel of consequence relations, which provides us with a set of rationality postulates for various forms of induction.

متن کامل

Comparing Abductive Theories

This paper introduces two methods for comparing explanation power of different abductive theories. One is comparing explainability for observations, and the other is comparing explanation contents for observations. Those two measures are represented by generality relations over abductive theories. The generality relations are naturally related to the notion of abductive equivalence introduced b...

متن کامل

On the logic of induction

This paper presents a logical analysis of induction. Contrary to common approaches to inductive logic that treat inductive validity as a real-valued generalisation of deductive validity, we argue that the only logical step in induction lies in hypothesis formation rather than evaluation. Inspired by the seminal paper of Kraus, Lehmann & Magidor [18] we analyse the logic of inductive hypothesis ...

متن کامل

Abductive case-based reasoning

This article will introduce abductive case-based reasoning (CBR) and attempt to show that abductive CBR and deductive CBR can be integrated in clinical process and problem solving. Then it provides a unified formalization for integration of abduction, abductive CBR, deduction and deductive CBR. This article also investigates abductive case retrieval and deductive case retrieval using similarity...

متن کامل

Entailment, Duality, and the Forms of Reasoning

We explore the notion of duality for defeasible entailment relations induced by preference orderings on states. We then show that such preferential entailment relations may be used to characterise Peircean inductive and abductive reasoning. Interpreting the preference relations as accessibility relations establishes modular Gödel-Löb logic as the modal logic of inductive and abductive reasoning. §

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Artif. Intell.

دوره 89  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1997