Computational Lexical Semantics, Incrementality, and the So-called Punctuality of Events
نویسنده
چکیده
The distinction between achievements and accomplishments is known to be an empirically important but subtle one. It is argued here to depend on the atomicity (rather than punctuality) of events, and to be strongly related to incrementality (i.e., to event-object mapping functions). A computational treatment of incrementality and atomicity is discussed in the paper, and a number of related empirical problems considered, notably lexical polysemy in verb argument relationships. I n t r o d u c t i o n Ever since Vendler (1957) introduced it, the socalled punctuality of achievements has been the object of many theoretical contests. After having demonstrated that punctuality actually breaks up into two, distinct notions, namely non-durativity and atomicity, I will argue here for a compositional semantic account of the latter. I will show that (non-)atomicity interacts closely with the notion of incrementality, as formulated in Dowty (1991), and that this property of verbs should be lexically encoded, although it is subject both to semantics and pragmatics-driven variations. I will finally discuss the formal specifications an NLP system could use to make predictions about atomicity and incrementality. 1. O n V e n d l e r ' s so -ca l l ed achievements Vendler (1957) defined achievements and accomplishments as respectively punctual and durative. He based his claims on two main tests, noting that at adverbials combine with achievements but not accomplishments, whereas finish combines with accomplishments but not achievements : (1 a) At what time did you reach the top ? At noon sharp. (lb) At what moment did you spot the plane ? At 10:53 A.M. (2a) *John finished leaving. (2b) John finished drawing the circle. Dowty (1986) and Moens and Steedman (1988) decisively questioned the coherence of the class of achievement verbs, arguing that not all of them are non-durative. As noted above, Vendler identifies punctual events through the conjunction of the (positive) at and (negative) finish tests. However, they do not always yield comparable results : (3a) (3b) (4a) (4b) Karpov beat Kasparov at 10.00 P.M. *The Allies beat Germany at I0.00 P.M. * Karpov finished beating Kasparov The Allies finished beating Germany. The at test fails to characterize (3b) as an achievement because it is durative, whereas (3a) passes this very test because it is non-durative. On the contrary, the fnish test in (4) yields an identical result for the beating of a chess player and that of a whole nation. It appears thus that the finish test does not indicate non-durativity, contrary to the at test, which refuses durative events, and that telic events such as (3b) fall outside Vendler's classification, since they fail both the finish test (unlike accomplishments) .AND the at test (unlike achievements). Since it
منابع مشابه
Achievements vs. Accomplishments : A Computational Treatment of Atomicity, Incrementality, and Perhaps of Event Structure
Achievements and accomplishments are argued in this paper to differ w.r.t. atomicity (rather than punctuality), a notion strongly but not exclusively related to incrementality, i.e., to eventobject mapping functions ; the latter will be shown to be unsufficient to account for certain cases of non-atomicity. A computational treatment of incrementality and atomicity will be presented, and a numbe...
متن کاملLexical Semantics and Selection of TAM in Bantu Languages: A Case of Semantic Classification of Kiswahili Verbs
The existing literature on Bantu verbal semantics demonstrated that inherent semantic content of verbs pairs directly with the selection of tense, aspect and modality formatives in Bantu languages like Chasu, Lucazi, Lusamia, and Shiyeyi. Thus, the gist of this paper is the articulation of semantic classification of verbs in Kiswahili based on the selection of TAM types. This is because the sem...
متن کاملThe role of Persian causative markers in the acquisition of English causative verbs
This project investigates the relationship between lexical semantics and causative morphology in the acquisition of causative/inchoative-related verbs in English as a foreign language by Iranian speakers. Results of translation and picture judgment task show although L2 learners have largely acquired the correct lexico-syntactic classification of verbs in English, they were constrained by ...
متن کامل"Punctuality" and Verb Semantics
Whether verbs have to be marked as punctual vs. durative has been a controversial issue from the very beginnings of research on aktionsarten in the last century right on up to modern theories of aspectual classes and aspect composition. Debates about the linguistic necessity of this distinction have often been accompanied by the question of what it means for a verb to be temporally punctual. In...
متن کاملWhen the Generative Lexicon meets Computational Semantics
Computational semantics and lexical semantics have so far mostly been studied separately. As a result, computational semantics often constructs meanings with poor or little lexical sense, while lexical semantics generally only apply to simple and small phrases (as opposed to complete sentences). We present here a general framework to incorporate lexical semantics information originating from a ...
متن کامل