Funding cuts for public health projects in Europe may affect international cancer effort.

نویسنده

  • John Illman
چکیده

The decision to halt funding for several major public health projects will force Europe to lose an " incredible opportunity " to build on the achievements of the Europe Against Cancer program, according to head of clinical programs at Cancer Research U.K. " It was just buried on a Web site. It's a reflection of the way that the [European Union] works. Communication is not its forte. " The threatened projects, including EPIC, EBCN, and ENCR, were launch as a major part of Europe Against Cancer, an EC-wide action plan aimed at reducing cancer mortality through public health efforts that range from encouraging healthy eating to introducing larger health warnings on cigarette packs. EPIC, the largest ever study of its kind, involves more than half a million people in 10 countries, has accumulated data on 25,000 cancer cases, and is just beginning to produce important findings, Boyle said. The ENCR has created quality control standards for cancer registration throughout Europe, preparing the way for EUROCARE, which has accumulated data from 67 population-based cancer registries in more than 20 countries. The EC's Public Health Directorate has become the enemy of many of Europe's cancer scientists for its funding decision. But Boyle said that the directorate is aware that a public health approach has been successful and remains important. " Unfortunately, it appears that their hands have been somewhat tied by the legislation authorizing the distribution of the funding available, " he said. " Until recently they've been outstanding in funding major public health networks and initiatives. " The funding decisions highlight the inevitable conflict between scientific objectives and other public priorities within the institutional triangle that lies at the heart of this unique brand of policy making: The European Commission includes 17,000 officials headed by 20 commissioners , including a health policy commissioner; the European Parliament has more than 600 members, directly elected every 5 years; and the Council of Ministers represents the governments of all member states and its approval is required for all major decisions. In theory, the EC proposes law and policy and the Parliament and Council approve them. In practice, the EC needs support from the other two bodies to launch major new projects. When Karin Jöns, a German member of the European Parliament and chair of the European Parliamentary Group on Breast Cancer, protested against not funding the projects, she said that she was told that …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Forecasting hospital expenditure in Victoria: lessons from Europe and Canada.

This paper specifies an econometric model to forecast State government expenditure on recognised public hospitals in Victoria. The OECD's recent cross-country econometric work exploring factors affecting health spending was instructive. The model found that Victorian Gross State Product, population aged under 4 years, the mix of public and private patients in public hospitals, introduction of c...

متن کامل

Is It More Important to Address the Issue of Patient Mobility or to Guarantee Universal Health Coverage in Europe?; Comment on “Regional Incentives and Patient Cross-Border Mobility: Evidence From the Italian Experience”

This paper discusses whether European institutions should devote so much attention and funding to cross-border healthcare or they should instead prioritise guaranteeing universal health coverage (UHC), inequalities and tackling the effects of austerity measures. The paper argues through providing the evidence in both areas of research, that the priority at European level from a public health an...

متن کامل

The Legal Strength of International Health Instruments - What It Brings to Global Health Governance?

Public health instruments have been under constant development and renewal for decades. International legal instruments, with their binding character and strength, have a special place in this development. The start of the 21st century saw, in particular, the birth of the first World Health Organization (WHO)-era health treaties – the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) and i...

متن کامل

Health policy and systems research agendas in developing countries

BACKGROUND: Health policy and systems research (HPSR) is an international public good with potential to orient investments and performance at national level. Identifying research trends and priorities at international level is therefore important. This paper offers a conceptual framework and defines the HPSR portfolio as a set of research projects under implementation. The research portfolio is...

متن کامل

Sustainability of Long-term Care: Puzzling Tasks Ahead for Policy-Makers

Background The sustainability of long-term care (LTC) is a prominent policy priority in many Western countries. LTC is one of the most pressing fiscal issues for the growing population of elderly people in the European Union (EU) Member States. Country recommendations regarding LTC are prominent under the EU’s European Semester.   Methods This paper examines challenges related to the financial-...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of the National Cancer Institute

دوره 96 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004