Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: an increasingly common cause for testicular pain and swelling
نویسندگان
چکیده
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is now a well established method for kidney procurement from living donors. In our centre, LDN is currently offered only to donors suitable for left nephrectomy. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of testicular pain and swelling following LDN. METHODS A total of 25 left-sided LDN male patients were assessed in a prospective structured interview together with a control cohort of 25 male patients who had undergone left-sided open donor nephrectomy (ODN). RESULTS Data were collected on testicular pain, swelling, numbness, urinary symptoms and sexual dysfunction from all 50 patients (100% response rate). Of the 25 LDN patients, 11 (44%) experienced ipsilateral testicular pain and/or swelling. In most instances, pain was of immediate onset, mild to moderate in severity, lasted for a few days to several weeks and was associated with testicular swelling (10 of 11 cases). However, testicular pain and/or swelling were not apparent in ODN patients, with only 2 of 25 (8%) experiencing mild testicular pain, 1 of whom also had swelling. CONCLUSIONS Testicular pain and swelling following LDN is a common problem. It is underreported in the literature and LDN should be included in the differential diagnoses of testicular pain and swelling. Further investigation is required to confirm our findings.
منابع مشابه
مقایسه کارکرد کلیه پیوندی یک سال پس از عمل بین نفرکتومی دهنده به روش باز و لاپاراسکوپیک
Background and purpose: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is an appropriate alternative for open donor nephrectomy in kidney transplant. The latter has been applied in most health centers for 50 years and it has been proven that unilateral nephrechtomy (laparotomy) is safe for the doner and so the remaining kidney can handle its function well. Since the former method for the kidney doner has been ...
متن کاملLiving donor nephrectomy: University of Miami technique and current results.
OBJECTIVES Living-donor nephrectomy has significantly expanded the pool of renal transplant donors, allowing for a marked increase in transplantation. Improvements in antirejection medications and refinement of donor selection criteria have allowed for extremely favorable rates of graft survival. More recently, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) has significantly reduced the morbidity of rena...
متن کاملTransvaginal Route for Kidney Extraction in Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The aim of this retrospective study was to compare conventional laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy with transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted living-donor nephrectomy in terms of feasibility and reproducibility. METHODS A total of 115 consecutive female patients who underwent laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy (n=70) or transvagi...
متن کاملThe safety and efficacy of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for renal transplantation: an updated meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND Currently, the laparoscopic technique is widely used for living donor nephrectomy. Does it provides adequate safety and benefits for the living donor? We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) as well as an analysis of postoperative quality of life compared with the open donor nephrectomy (ODN). METHODS Eligible studies...
متن کاملOpen versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a focus on the safety of donors and the need for a donor registry.
PURPOSE A review of the existing literature showed that the subject of live donor nephrectomy is a seat of underreporting and underestimation of complications. We provide a systematic comparison between laparoscopic and open live donor nephrectomy with special emphasis on the safety of donors and grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS The PubMed literature database was searched from inception to Octob...
متن کامل