Projection in the Epistemic Situation Calculus with Belief Conditionals
نویسندگان
چکیده
A fundamental task in reasoning about action and change is projection, which refers to determining what holds after a number of actions have occurred. A powerful method for solving the projection problem is regression, which reduces reasoning about the future to reasoning about the initial state. In particular, regression has played an important role in the situation calculus and its epistemic extensions. Recently, a modal variant of the situation calculus was proposed, which allows an agent to revise its beliefs based on so-called belief conditionals as part of its knowledge base. In this paper, we show how regression can be extended to reduce beliefs about the future to initial beliefs in the presence of belief conditionals. Moreover, we show how any remaining belief operators can be eliminated as well, thus reducing the belief projection problem to ordinary first-order entailments.
منابع مشابه
Belief revision and projection in the epistemic situation calculus
This article considers defeasible beliefs in dynamic settings. In particular, we examine the belief projection problem: what is believed after performing an action and/or receiving new information? The approach is based on an epistemic variant of Reiter’s situation calculus, where actions not only have physical effects but may also provide new information to the agent. The preferential belief s...
متن کاملBelief Revision and Progression of Knowledge Bases in the Epistemic Situation Calculus
Fundamental to reasoning about actions and beliefs is the projection problem: to decide what is believed after a sequence of actions is performed. Progression is one widely applied technique to solve this problem. In this paper we propose a novel framework for computing progression in the epistemic situation calculus. In particular, we model an agent’s preferential belief structure using condit...
متن کاملA Semantic Account of Iterated Belief Revision in the Situation Calculus
Recently Shapiro et al. explored the notion of iterated belief revision within Reiter’s version of the situation calculus. In particular, they consider a notion of belief defined as truth in the most plausible situations. To specify what an agent is willing to believe at different levels of plausibility they make use of so-called belief conditionals, which themselves neither refer to situations...
متن کاملEntrenchment of Knowledge Types 1 On the epistemic entrenchment of different types of knowledge expressed as conditionals in belief revision tasks
On the epistemic entrenchment of different types of knowledge expressed as conditionals in belief revision tasks Renée Elio Abstract Some belief revision theories appeal to the notion of epistemic entrenchment as a guide to choosing among alternative ways of removing inconsistency that new information may cause with existing beliefs. While belief revision theorists may not be interested in natu...
متن کاملEpistemic Conditionals and Conditional Epistemics
There has been a murder in the mansion. There are, and we all know that this is so, only three suspects: the gardener, the driver, and the butler. We believe, and we have our reasons for so believing, that if the gardener did not do it, then the driver did. We share belief in this particular conditional, and this conditional is of a particular kind. It is what Quine calls an ‘‘ordinary indicati...
متن کامل