Taniguchi ( Japan ) Sector Costs and Ancillary Benefits of Mitigation 9
نویسندگان
چکیده
References 595 CONTENTS Policies adopted to mitigate global warming will have implications for specific sectors, such as the coal industry, the oil and gas industry, electricity, manufacturing, transportation and households. A sectoral assessment helps to put the costs in perspective , to identify the potential losers, and the extent and location of the losses, as well as to identify the sectors that may benefit. However, it is worth noting that the available literature to make this assessment is limited: there are few comprehensive studies of the sectoral effects of mitigation, compared with those on the macro gross domestic product (GDP) effects, and they tend to be for Annex B countries and regions. There is a fundamental problem for mitigation policies. It is well established that, compared to the situation for potential gainers, the potential sectoral losers are easier to identify, and their losses are likely to be more immediate, more concentrated , and more certain. The potential sectoral gainers (apart from the renewables sector and perhaps the natural gas sector) can only expect a small, diffused, and rather uncertain gain, spread over a long period. Indeed many of those who may gain do not exist, being future generations and industries yet to develop. It is also well established that the overall effects on GDP of mitigation policies and measures, whether positive or negative, conceal large differences between sectors. In general, the energy intensity and the carbon intensity of the economies will decline. The coal and perhaps the oil industries are expected to lose substantial proportions of output relative to those in the reference scenarios, but other sectors may increase their outputs yet by much smaller proportions. Energy-intensive sectors , such as heavy chemicals, iron and steel, and mineral products , will face higher costs, accelerated technical or organizational change, or loss of output (again relative to the reference scenario) depending on their energy use and the policies adopted for mitigation. Other industries, including renewables and services, can be expected to benefit in the long term from the availability of financial and other resources that would otherwise have been taken up in fossil fuel production. They may also benefit from reductions in tax burdens, if taxes are used for mitigation, and the revenues recycled as reductions in employer or corporate or other taxes. Within this broad picture, certain sectors will be substantially affected by mitigation. The coal industry, producing the most …
منابع مشابه
The Ancillary Health Benefits and Costs of Ghg Mitigation: Scope, Scale, and Credibility
Climate change mitigation policies will bring with them ancillary or secondary benefits and costs in addition to those directly associated with avoided temperature changes. The ancillary public health effects of air pollutant emission changes (such as in reductions in particulate matter (PM)) have been the focus of some research attention. However, none of the major economic models of climate i...
متن کاملTHE ANCILLARY BENEFITS AND COSTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK by Alan KRUPNICK, Dallas BURTRAW and Anil MARKANDYA
Within the broad set of climate change issues, one that is growing in controversy and potential importance is the ancillary benefits and costs of policies to reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs). Ancillary benefits and costs are externalities arising from GHG abatement policies that are achieved jointly with the reduction of GHGs in the atmosphere. Analysts have attempted to identify and in some case...
متن کاملNotes About Comparing Long-term Care Expenditures Across Countries; Comment on “Financing Long-term Care: Lessons From Japan”
The comparison of long-term care (LTC) expenditures is a difficult task. National LTC systems differ widely in terms of eligibility criteria, level of benefits, institutional variety and regional heterogeneity. In this commentary I will first give some general remarks on cross country comparisons. Then I discuss the role of the informal sector which is the most importan...
متن کاملAppendix B: Measuring the Cost of Climate Policy
This note provides an overview of different measures of costs of climate policy. While in our studies we stress emissions prices and welfare changes, here we illustrate the measures in most common use, showing results for the 167 bmt scenario from Paltsev et al (2009). Similar results for the other scenarios can be derived from Appendix A to that report. These are studies of mitigation costs on...
متن کاملBaseline Issues in the Estimation of the Ancillary Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies
Greenhouse gas reduction policies which alter fossil fuel use can have near term environmental and social impacts quite distinct from the longer term benefits for climate change for which they were originally designed. The air pollution-related health improvements that accompany the reduction in GHGs are the best understood of these so-called ancillary or co-control benefits. Impacts on traffic...
متن کامل