A Semantic Attack on Divine-command Meta Ethics
نویسنده
چکیده
According to divine-command metaethics (DCM), whatever is morally good or right has that status because, and only because, it conforms to God:� will. I argue that DCM is false or vacuous: either DCM is false, or else there are no instantiated moral properties, and no moral truths, to which DCM can even apply. The sort of criticism I offer is familiar, but I develop it in what I believe is a novel way.
منابع مشابه
A Comparative Study of the “Ideal Observer” in Meta-ethics and the “Divine Command” Theory
The two theories of “ideal observer” and “divine command” are theories on constructionism and voluntarism. According to the ideal theory, ethical realities are defined based on the attitudes of the assumed ideal observers and the foundation of these theories is formed on negation of the independent ethical realities. Therefore, existence of independent and evident ethical realities based on whi...
متن کاملThe Relation of Intellectual and Religious Goodness and Badness in Isma`il`s Sacrifice
Through formulating the conflict between reason and religion, in this study the point of conflict is determined. Then, explaining the intellectual and religious badness and goodness (divine command theory), their relation with Ismail`s sacrifice will be analyzed. According to theory of divine command, ethical knowledge will have a maximum dependence on religion. When we present this principle t...
متن کامل“Lean not on your own understanding”: Belief that morality is founded on divine authority and non-utilitarian moral judgments
Recent research has shown that religious individuals are much more resistant to utilitarian modes of thinking than their less religious counterparts, but the reason for this is not clear. We propose that a meta-ethical belief that morality is rooted in inviolable divine commands (i.e., endorsement of Divine Command Theory) may help explain this finding. We present a novel 20-item scale measurin...
متن کاملAn Axiological Approach to Virtue Ethics
The resurgence of interest in virtue ethics can be traced to the late 1950s and to the work of Elizabeth Anscombe and Philippa Foot. On Anscombe's view, both deontologism and consequentialism are guilty of judging the " rightness " or " wrongness " of actions on the model of rendering a verdict based on one's understanding of the law and of an agent's obligations under the law. The fundamental ...
متن کاملA Defensible Divine Command Theory
The term 'The Divine Command Theory of Ethics' is similar to 'The Ontological Argument' in that there is no unique entity deserving of that title. Rather, there is a multiplicity of theories, each of which is appropriately taken to be a divine command theory. The strongest versions are, if not the finest, at least definist. That is, according to these versions moral predicates, such as 'is obli...
متن کامل