Approval Voting in Box Societies
نویسندگان
چکیده
Under approval voting, every voter may vote for any number of candidates. To model approval voting, we let a political spectrum be the set of all possible political positions, and let each voter have a subset of the spectrum that they approve, called an approval region. The fraction of all voters who approve the most popular position is the agreement proportion for the society. We consider voting in societies whose political spectrum is modeled by d-dimensional space (Rd) with approval regions defined by axis-parallel boxes. For such societies, we first consider a Turán-type problem, attempting to find the maximum agreement between pairs of voters for a society with a given level of overall agreement. We prove a lower bound on this maximum agreement and find in the literature a proof that the lower bound is optimal. By this result we find that for sufficiently large n, any n-voter box society in Rd where at least α(2) pairs of voters agree on some position must have a position contained in βn approval regions, where α = 1 − (1 − β)2/d. We also consider an extension of this problem involving projections of approval regions to axes. Finally we consider the question of (k, m)-agreeable box societies, where a society is said to be (k, m)-agreeable if among every m voters, some k approve a common position. In the m = 2k− 1 case, we use methods from graph theory to prove that the agreement proportion is at least 1/(2d) for any integer k ≥ 2.
منابع مشابه
Going from theory to practice: the mixed success of approval voting
Approval voting (AV) is a voting system in which voters can vote for, or approve of, as many candidates as they like in multicandidate elections. In 1987 and 1988, four scientific and engineering societies, collectively comprising several hundred thousand members, used AV for the first time. Since then, about half a dozen other societies have adopted AV. Usually its adoption was seriously debat...
متن کاملApproval Voting in Product Societies
In approval voting, individuals vote for all platforms that they find acceptable. In this situation it is natural to ask: When is agreement possible? What conditions guarantee that some fraction of the voters agree on even a single platform? Berg et. al. found such conditions when voters are asked to make a decision on a single issue that can be represented on a linear spectrum. In particular, ...
متن کاملApproval voting and positional voting methods: Inference, relationship, examples
Approval voting is the voting method recently adopted by the Society for Social Choice and Welfare. Positional voting methods include the famous plurality, antiplurality, and Borda methods. We extend the inference framework of Tsetlin and Regenwetter (2003) from majority rule to approval voting and all positional voting methods. We also establish a link between approval voting and positional vo...
متن کاملOn the Manipulability of Votes: The Case of Approval Voting
The famous result of Gibbard and Satterthwaite shows that every voting procedure is manipulable if the voters can have any preferences over the candidates. That is, a voter may improve the voting result by not voting according to his true preference. Approval voting, introduced by Brams and Fishburn, is not manipulable if preferences are dichotomous: each voter only distinguishes between accept...
متن کاملProportional Approval Method using Squared loads, Approval removal and Coin-flip approval transformation (PAMSAC) - a new system of proportional representation using approval voting
Several multi-winner systems that use approval voting have been developed but they each suffer from various problems. Six of these methods are discussed in this paper. They are Satisfaction Approval Voting, Minimax Approval Voting, Proportional Approval Voting, Monroe's Fully Proportional Representation, Chamberlin-Courant's Rule, and Ebert's method. They all fail at least one of Proportional R...
متن کامل