Multi-Tasking and Inequity Aversion in the Linear-Exponential-Normal Moral Hazard Model
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper analyzes the impact of wage comparisons among inequity-averse agents on optimal incentive intensities in a linear–exponential–normal moral hazard model with multi-tasking. We consider individual and team production tasks that differ in that only individual production causes wage inequality. If the tasks are substitutes in the agents’ effort cost functions, the principal might want to balance incentives and reduce the agents’ overall inequality exposure. We show that team production incentives can then be muted below the level that results from noisy measurement and risk aversion alone—even though team production does not cause wage inequality. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.010 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-65998 Accepted Version Originally published at: Bartling, Björn (2012). Multi-tasking and inequity aversion in the linear–exponential–normal moral hazard model. Economics Letters, 116(3):523-525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.010 Multi-Tasking and Inequity Aversion in the Linear-Exponential-Normal Moral Hazard Model Björn Bartling∗ April 2012 forthcoming in: Economics Letters
منابع مشابه
Inequity Aversion and Moral Hazard with Multiple Agents
We analyze how inequity aversion interacts with incentive provision in an otherwise standard moral hazard model with two risk averse agents. We find that behindness aversion (suffering only when being worse off) among agents unambiguously increases agency costs of providing incentives. This holds true if agents also suffer from being better off unless they account for effort costs in their comp...
متن کاملOptimal incentive contracts under inequity aversion
Optimal Incentive Contracts under Inequity Aversion We analyze the Moral Hazard problem, assuming that agents are inequity averse. Our results differ from conventional contract theory and are more in line with empirical findings than standard results. We find: First, inequity aversion alters the structure of optimal contracts. Second, there is a strong tendency towards linear sharing rules. Thi...
متن کاملContracts and Inequity Aversion
Inequity aversion is a special form of other regarding preferences and captures many features of reciprocal behavior, an apparently robust pattern in human nature. Using this concept we analyze the Moral Hazard problem and derive several results which differ from conventional contract theory. Our three key insights are: First, inequity aversion plays a crucial role in the design of optimal cont...
متن کاملContracting in the wine supply chain with bilateral moral hazard, residual claimancy and multi-tasking
This paper takes a quasi-case-study approach to stylised wine industry facts to assess predictions about the optimal sharing rule from a principal–agent model with residual claimancy. An optimal sharing contract is developed between a grape grower and a winery, when a risk-averse grower allocates efforts among multiple activities that differ in measurability, while double-sided moral hazard is ...
متن کاملManagement Buy-out Pricing Model: A Fairness Preference Perspective
In order to determine the effective and reasonable management buyout price, considered of asymmetric information, this paper investigated the shareholders’ decision-making behavior during the management buyout pricing process under a fairness preferences perspective. The conclusions in this paper were 1) The greater the value of the option, the smaller the critical probability of management buy...
متن کامل