Review of Hemostatic Agents Used in Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgeries

surgical cases compared to robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Sixty-nine percent (n = 33) of fellows indicated that robot-assisted laparoscopy allows them to perform more challenging surgical cases compared to conventional laparoscopy. Fifty six percent (n = 27) of fellows agreed that the cost associated with robotassisted laparoscopy is the greatest disadvantage of using robot-assisted laparoscopy. Seventy-nine percent (n = 38) of fellows plan to use conventional laparoscopy more than robot-assisted laparoscopy after fellowship completion. Ninety-six percent (n = 46) of fellows indicated that they plan to practice at a hospital that offers robotic surgery after fellowship completion. Conclusion: The majority of AAGL MIGS fellows desire to participate in robotic surgery. More research needs to be performed regarding the training needs of AAGL MIGS fellows.