6-month clinical outcomes following implantation of the bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold in vessels smaller or larger than 2.5 mm.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVES We investigated the 6-month clinical outcomes after implantation of second-generation 3.0-mm bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffolds (BVS) in small coronary vessels (<2.5 mm). BACKGROUND BVS are a novel approach to treating coronary lesions and are untested in small vessels. METHODS The ABSORB Cohort B Trial is a multicenter, single-arm, prospective, open-label trial assessing the performance of the second-generation BVS, in which 101 patients were enrolled. The pre-procedural reference vessel diameter (RVD) was assessed by quantitative coronary angiography during post hoc analysis. The vessel size was overestimated, by visual assessment, in 41 patients before implantation of 3.0-mm BVS in vessels with a pre-procedural RVD <2.5 mm. The study population was divided into 2 groups, group I (n = 41) with RVD <2.5 mm and group II (n = 60) with RVD ≥2.5 mm. The composite endpoint of ischemia-driven major adverse cardiac events, defined as ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, myocardial infarction, or cardiac death, was assessed. Of the 45 patients scheduled for 6-month coronary angiography, 42 patients had the procedure performed, with intravascular ultrasound undertaken in 40 of these patients. RESULTS At 6 months, no significant differences in ischemia-driven major adverse cardiac events (3 of 41 [7.3%] cases vs. 2 of 60 [3.3%] cases; p = 0.3933) were observed in the small- and large-vessel groups, respectively. No cardiac deaths or episodes of in-scaffold thromboses were seen. Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up demonstrated no differences in late lumen loss (0.16 ± 0.18 mm vs. 0.21 ± 0.17 mm; p = 0.3525) or percentage lumen area stenosis (17.6 ± 6.0% vs. 19.8 ± 8.5%; p = 0.3643). CONCLUSIONS The second-generation 3.0-mm BVS appears to be safe in small vessels, with similar clinical and angiographic outcomes compared with those of large vessels.
منابع مشابه
Clinical Outcomes From The Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: Is There A Role for Them?
The risk of stent thrombosis and restenosis with the second generation drug eluting stents remains. The bioresorbable vascular scaffold is a third generation stent and overcomes the problems associated with drug eluting metallic stents. The bioresorbable vascular scaffold completely absorbs within the coronary vessel over 3-5 years. Multiple trials in patients with non complex coronary disease ...
متن کاملEvaluation of the second generation of a bioresorbable everolimus drug-eluting vascular scaffold for treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis: six-month clinical and imaging outcomes.
BACKGROUND The first generation of the bioresorbable everolimus drug-eluting vascular scaffold showed signs of shrinkage at 6 months, which largely contributed to late luminal loss. Nevertheless, late luminal loss was less than that observed with bare metal stents. To maintain the mechanical integrity of the device up to 6 months, the scaffold design and manufacturing process of its polymer wer...
متن کاملCan Long-Term Results Following Balloon Angioplasty Be the “Crystal Ball” to Predict Outcome Following Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds?
I n this issue, Yamaji et al 1 report the very long-term (15-year) outcomes of patients treated successfully with balloon angioplasty (BA) compared with bare-metal stent implantation (BMS). Considering the major progresses made in interventional cardiology since the advent of BA, it would be reasonable to question what relevance these data have in the era of thirdand fourth-generation drug-elut...
متن کاملA comparative assessment by optical coherence tomography of the performance of the first and second generation of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.
AIMS The first generation of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS 1.0) showed an angiographic late loss higher than the metallic everolimus-eluting stent Xience V due to scaffold shrinkage. The new generation (BVS 1.1) presents a different design and manufacturing process than the BVS 1.0. This study sought to evaluate the differences in late shrinkage, neointimal respons...
متن کاملFirst serial assessment at 6 months and 2 years of the second generation of absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a multi-imaging modality study.
BACKGROUND Nonserial observations have shown this bioresorbable scaffold to have no signs of area reduction at 6 months and recovery of vasomotion at 1 year. Serial observations at 6 months and 2 years have to confirm the absence of late restenosis or unfavorable imaging outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS The ABSORB trial is a multicenter single-arm trial assessing the safety and performance of an...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
دوره 58 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011