Copyright © 2000 by The Resilience Alliance
نویسندگان
چکیده
We report an analysis of forest fragmentation based on 1-km resolution land-cover maps for the globe. Measurements in analysis windows from 81 km 2 (9 x 9 pixels, “small” scale) to 59,049 km 2 (243 x 243 pixels, “large” scale) were used to characterize the fragmentation around each forested pixel. We identified six categories of fragmentation (interior, perforated, edge, transitional, patch, and undetermined) from the amount of forest and its occurrence as adjacent forest pixels. Interior forest exists only at relatively small scales; at larger scales, forests are dominated by edge and patch conditions. At the smallest scale, there were significant differences in fragmentation among continents; within continents, there were significant differences among individual forest types. Tropical rain forest fragmentation was most severe in North America and least severe in Europe–Asia. Forest types with a high percentage of perforated conditions were mainly in North America (five types) and Europe–Asia (four types), in both temperate and subtropical regions. Transitional and patch conditions were most common in 11 forest types, of which only a few would be considered as “naturally patchy” (e.g., dry woodland). The five forest types with the highest percentage of interior conditions were in North America; in decreasing order, they were cool rain forest, coniferous, conifer boreal, cool mixed, and cool broadleaf.
منابع مشابه
Critical Factors that Foster Local Self-Governance of Common- Pool Resources: The Role of Heterogeneity
Paper to be delivered at the Annual Meeting of the Resilience Alliance to be held in Chiang Mai, Thailand, August, 16-18 2001 and at a Conference on Inequality, Collective Action, and Environmental Sustainability, to be held at the Sante Fe Institute, September 21-23, 2001. Support of the Resilience Alliance, the National Science Foundation and the European Union (contract nr. IST-2000-26016)...
متن کاملDo Firms Learn to Create Value? the Case of Alliances
We investigate whether firms learn to manage interfirm alliances as experience accumulates. We use contract-specific experience measures in a data set of over 2000 joint ventures and licensing agreements, and value creation measures derived from the abnormal stock returns surrounding alliance announcements. Learning effects are identified from the effects of unobserved heterogeneity in alliance...
متن کاملLearning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances: Building Relational Capital
One of the main reasons that firms participate in alliances is to learn know-how and capabilities from their alliance partners. At the same time firms want to protect themselves from the opportunistic behavior of their partner to retain their own core proprietary assets. Most research has generally viewed the achievement of these objectives as mutually exclusive. In contrast, we provide empiric...
متن کاملInterorganizational Alliances and the Performance of Firms: a Study of Growth and Innovation Rates in a High- Technology Industry
This paper investigates the relationship between intercorporate technology alliances and firm performance. It argues that alliances are access relationships, and therefore that the advantages which a focal firm derives from a portfolio of strategic coalitions depend upon the resource profiles of its alliance partners. In particular, large firms and those that possess leading-edge technological ...
متن کاملExplaining the Growth of International R&D Alliances in China
This paper explores two key research questions: (1) what are the growth trends of international research and development (R&D) collaborations in China; and (2) what factors determine the choice of international R&D alliance objectives in terms of a research or development orientation? It examines the rapid growth of international R&D alliances in China over the 1995–2000 period and explains mul...
متن کامل