Polar Climate Simulation of the NCAR CCM3*,1

Present-day Arctic and Antarctic climate of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Community Climate Model version 3 (CCM3) is presented. The CCM3 simulation is from a prescribed and interannually varying sea surface temperature integration from January 1979 through August 1993. Observations from a variety of sources, including the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts analyses, rawinsonde, and surface station data, are used for validation of CCM3’s polar climate during this period. Overall, CCM3 can simulate many important polar climatic features and in general is an incremental improvement over CCM2. The 500-hPa polar vortex minima are too deep by 50–100 m and too zonally symmetric. The Arctic sea level pressure maximum is displaced poleward, while the Icelandic region minimum is extended toward Europe, and the Aleutian region minimum is extended toward Asia. The Antarctic circumpolar trough of low sea level pressure is slightly north of the observed position and is 2–3 hPa too low. Antarctic katabatic winds are similar to observations in magnitude and regional variation. The Antarctic surface wind stress is estimated to be 30%– 50% too strong in some regions. Polar tropospheric temperatures are 28–48C colder than observations, mostly in the summer season. Low-level winter inversions over the Arctic Ocean are only 38–48C, rather than the observed 108C. In the Antarctic midcontinent they are around 258–308C (about 58 stronger than observed) and continue to be stronger than observed along the coast. Although water vapor column is uniformly low by 10%– 20% compared to analyses in both polar regions, the regional patterns of minima over Greenland and the East Antarctic plateau are well represented. Annual 708 to pole CCM3 values are 5.8 kg m22 for the Arctic and 1.7 kg m22 for the Antarctic. The regional distribution of precipitation minus evaporation compares reasonably with analyses. The annual 708 to pole values are 18.1 cm yr21, which are close to the most recent observational estimates of 16 to 18 cm yr21 in the Arctic and 18.4 6 3.7 cm yr21 in the Antarctic. In both polar regions, summer surface energy budgets are estimated to be low by roughly 20 W m22. Suggestions as to causes of simulation deficiencies are 1) polar heat sinks that are too strong; 2) inadequate representation of sea-ice–atmosphere heat exchange, due to lack of fractional coverage of sea ice of variable thickness; 3) effects of low horizontal resolution; and 4) biased extrapolar influence.