Forthcoming Games and Economic Behavior
نویسندگان
چکیده
People can become less cooperative when threatened with sanctions, and previous research suggests both "intentions" and incentives underlie this effect. We report data from an experiment aimed at determining the relative importance of intentions and incentives in producing non-cooperative behavior. Participants play a one-shot investment experiment in pairs. Investors send an amount to trustees, request a return on this investment and, in some treatments, can threaten sanctions to enforce their requests. Decisions by trustees facing threats imposed (or not) by investors are compared to decisions by trustees facing threats imposed (or not) by nature. When not threatened, trustees typically decide to return a positive amount less than the investor requested. When threatened this decision becomes least common. If the request is large relative to the sanction then most trustees return nothing. If the request is small, trustees typically return the requested amount. These results do not vary with investors’ intentions. JEL classification: C71; C91
منابع مشابه
Learning under limited information
We study how human subjects learn under extremely limited information. We use Chen’s (forthcoming) data on cost sharing games, and Van Huyck et al.’s (1996, Manuscript) data on coordination games to compare three payoff-based learning models. Under the serial mechanism and coordination games, the payoff-assessment learning model (Sarin and Vahid, 1999, Games Econ. Behav. 28, 294–309) tracks the...
متن کاملOn the correspondence of contracts to salaries in (many-to-many) matching
In this note, I extend the work of Echenique (forthcoming) to show that a model of many-to-many matching with contracts may be embedded into a model of many-tomany matching with wage bargaining whenever (1) all agents’ preferences are substitutable and (2) the matching with contracts model is unitary, in the sense that every contractual relationship between a given firm–worker pair is specified...
متن کاملRevisiting games of incomplete information with analogy-based expectations
This paper studies the effects of analogy-based reasoning in static two-player games of incomplete information. As in Jehiel (“Analogy-Based Expectation Equilibrium”, Journal of Economic Theory, forthcoming) players are assumed to be boundedly rational in the way they forecast their opponent’s state-contingent strategy. They bundle states into analogy classes and play best responses to their op...
متن کاملRepresentation of conditional preferences under uncertainty
This paper presents axioms for systems of conditional preferences and provides representation results for these systems. It reports on a new way of representing a system of conditional preferences, by means of a system of conditional lexicographic probabilities (SCLP) (cf. Asheim and Perea, Games and Economic Behavior, forthcoming). An SCLP ensures well-defined conditional beliefs representing ...
متن کامل– FORTHCOMING in Games and Economic Behavior – When does aggregation reduce risk aversion ? ∗
We study the problem of risk sharing within a household or syndicate. A household shares risky prospects using a social welfare function. We characterize the social welfare functions such that the household is collectively less risk averse than each member, and satisfies the Pareto principle and an independence axiom. We single out the sum of certainty equivalents as the unique member of this f...
متن کاملForthcoming Economic Inquiry Expectation Formation in Step-Level Public Good Games
This paper focuses on the process of expectation formation. Specifically, the question is addressed whether individuals think strategically when they form beliefs about other players' behavior. Most belief learning models assume that people abstract from strategic considerations. Using an incentive compatible mechanism, experimental data are o btained on subjects' expectations in a step-level p...
متن کامل