Offsetting Opposing Left-Turn Lanes at Signalized Intersections: A Safety Assessment Case Study in Lincoln, Nebraska
نویسنده
چکیده
Opposing left-turning vehicles at signalized intersections block each others’ view of oncoming traffic. The ability to see oncoming traffic is critical for safe negotiation of left-turns at intersections during a permitted left-turn phase of the signal. Offsetting of opposing left-turn lanes at signalized intersections improves sight distance for left-turning motorists. This paper reports on a case study conducted in the City of Lincoln, Nebraska that was aimed at analyzing the safety benefits from offsetting opposing left-turn lanes at signalized intersections. Data from before-after scenarios were analyzed using the empirical Bayes procedure, which accounts for the effects of regression to the mean. The multivariate regression method was used to estimate the expected number of crashes for a reference population of 36 non-treated intersection approaches with similar geometric and traffic characteristics as the treated sites. These estimates were then used to determine the expected number of crashes at the treated sites in the ‘after’ period, had the treatment not been applied. Results from this study indicate a 1.5 percent change in safety. Based on the results, the author concludes that safety improved (but only minimally) at the three treated intersections as a result of offsetting opposing left-turn lanes.
منابع مشابه
Developing an Analytical Model and Simulation of The Contraflow Left-Turn Lane at Signalized Intersections
At some intersections, excessive queue lengths may spill out of the left-turn bay and block the through lanes, jeopardizing level of service for the entire intersection. One of the most effective plans recently presented by the researchers is the "Contraflow left-turn lane" (CLL) In this method, left-turn vehicles will use the nearest lane in the opposite direction in addition to the usual left...
متن کاملEvaluation of left-turn lane offset using the naturalistic driving study data.
INTRODUCTION The Strategic Highway Research Program 2 (SHRP 2) Naturalistic Driving Study (NDS) data were used to evaluate gap acceptance behavior of drivers at left-turn lanes with negative, zero, or positive offsets ranging from -29 ft to +6 ft. The objectives of the study were to develop guidance for the design of offset left-turn lanes used as a safety countermeasure, and to provide insight...
متن کاملModeling left-turn crash occurrence at signalized intersections by conflicting patterns.
In order to better understand the underlying crash mechanisms, left-turn crashes occurring at 197 four-legged signalized intersections over 6 years were classified into nine patterns based on vehicle maneuvers and then were assigned to intersection approaches. Crash frequency of each pattern was modeled at the approach level by mainly using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) with the Negati...
متن کاملTemporal and spatial analyses of rear-end crashes at signalized intersections.
In this study, the generalized estimating equations with the negative binomial link function were used to model rear-end crash frequencies at signalized intersections to account for the temporal or spatial correlation among the data. The longitudinal data for 208 signalized intersections over 3 years and the spatially correlated data for 476 signalized intersections which are located along diff...
متن کاملEstimating the Safety Benefits of Red Light Cameras at Signalized Intersections in Urban Areas Case Study: The City of Virginia Beach
The Highway Safety Manual [HSM, 2010] recommends safety evaluations be performed before implementing any roadway treatment to predict the expected safety consequences. Safety consequences can be measured using crash prediction models, Crash Modification Factor (CMFs), or both. This paper develops a CMF to show the expected impact of red-light cameras (RLCs) on safety at signalized intersections...
متن کامل