A Comparison of Daily Average Consumption Of Oxycodone Controlled Release (OxyContin CR) And Oxymorphone Extended Release (Opana ER) In Patients With Low Back Pain.

OBJECTIVE Our goal was to examine the daily average consumption (DACON) of oxycodone controlled-release tablets (OxyContin CR)and oxymorphone extended-release tablets (Opana ER) in patients with low back pain. STUDY DESIGN An observational, retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with multiple prescriptions for oxycodone CR or oxymorphone ER tablets. These patients also had International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes for low back pain. Pharmacy prescription medication claims data were obtained from a large commercially insured health plan in the U.S. Mean daily consumption was calculated for a 90-day period. METHODS We used descriptive statistics to evaluate patient demographics and health plan characteristics. Univariate analyses were used to examine the data as observed. A generalized linear model with a gamma distribution and log-link function provided a sensitivity measure, adjusting for heterogeneity among patients and the skewed nature of the DACON variable. RESULTS A total of 4,023 patients received oxycodone CR, and 374 patients received oxymorphone ER. The mean age of patients (standard deviation, SD) was 49.0 (11.6) years for oxycodone CR and 47.3 (10.6) years for oxymorphone ER. DACON of oxycodone CR was 3.2 tablets per day, and DACON of oxymorphone ER was 2.7 tablets per day (P < 0.01). Utilization of maximum-strength tablets of oxycodone CR 80 mg was 3.9 tablets per day, which was significantly higher, by one tablet per day, than the utilization of equipotent oxymorphone ER maximum-strength tablets of 40 mg at 2.9 tablets per day (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION The use of oxycodone CR, measured as mean daily consumption over a 90-day period, was significantly higher than that for oxymorphone ER in these patients, a finding that could have financial implications for health care systems.