In Deference to Reference

نویسنده

  • Aurel Segal
چکیده

This dissertation consists in three separate papers. The topic of Iln Deference to Refernnts' is the semantic structure of belief reports of the form 'A believes that pl. I argue that no existing theory of these sentences satisfactorily accounts for anaphoric relations among expressions inside and outside of the embedded complement sentences. I propose a new account of belief reports, which assigns to embedded expressions their normal semantic values, but which also exploits Frege's idea of using senses to explain the apparent failures of extensionality in the reports. In 'Who's Afraid of Narrow Minds?' I defend the thesis that the propositional attitudes ascribed by folk psychology possess a level of content ('narrow content') that is independent of anything outside the subject. I examine various objections to that conclusion, and show that they fail. In ISeeing What is not Therel I examine the nature of the representational contents attributed to perceptual states by the computational theory of vision. I discuss Tyler Burge's claim that such contents are not narrow, but depend essentially on aspects of the external environment. I show that the claim is false, and that the explanatory power of the theory of vision depends upon its employment of a notion of narrow content.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Campaign Finance after Mccain-feingold When “the Pols Make the Calls”: Mcconnell’s Theory of Judicial Deference in the Twilight of Buckley

This Article analyzes the component parts of “judicial deference” as set out in McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, and assesses their interrelationship and persuasiveness. Part I locates McConnell within the history of struggles over the proper role of courts and legislatures in the constitutional design and oversight of campaign finance controls. It attempts to show how the Court could ...

متن کامل

Losing deference in the FDA's second century: judicial review, politics, and a diminished legacy of expertise.

INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 939 R I. THE IMPORTANCE OF DEFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 941 R II. THE PARTICIPANTS IN THE DEFERENCE DEBATE . . . . . . . . . . . . 942 R III. THE SUPREME COURT’S DEFERENCE TO THE FDA . . . . . . . . . 943 R IV. THE TYPES OF DEFERENCE ENJOYED BY THE FDA . ...

متن کامل

A study on needed or unneeded ReDosimetry and Recomissioning of a linac with Add on MLC by Comparing Dosimetric Data

Introduction: Today different uses of multileaf collimators(MLC) in different techniques of radiotherapy are common. Due to the use of this facility it is possible to have maximum radiation dose to target volumes and minimum radiation dose to critical tissues surronding treatment volumes. But there are numerouse Linear accelerators in IRAN without MLC. Because of high price of...

متن کامل

Deference and Essentialism in the Categorization of Chemical Kinds

Psychological essentialism has been subject to much debate. Yet a key implication – that people should defer to experts in categorizing natural kinds – has not been widely examined. Three experiments examine deference in the categorization of chemical kinds. The first establishes borderline cases used in the second and third. These latter show limited deference to experts, and some deference to...

متن کامل

In Search of a Theory of Deference: The Eighth Amendment, Democratic Pedigree, and Constitutional Decision Making

The Supreme Court's recent Eighth Amendment death penalty case law is in disarray, and the confusion is symptomatic of a larger problem in constitutional doctrine. In Baze v. Rees and Kennedy v. Louisiana, the Court approached the challenged state policies with vastly different levels of deference. Though the Court purported to apply longstanding Eighth Amendment tests in both cases, Baze was h...

متن کامل

A Plea for Moral Deference

It seems to be a commonplace of the philosophical literature that there is no such thing as moral expertise. Or perhaps, more narrowly, that there is no such thing as justified deference to moral expertise, when there is moral expertise. On the other hand, a warrant for moral deference seems to have a secure place in everyday moral experience. It is illustrated, for example, by the ubiquitous p...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008