Share Restrictions, Liquidity Premium and Offshore Hedge Funds
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper examines liquidity premium focusing on the difference between offshore and onshore hedge funds. Due to tax provisions and regulatory concerns, offshore and onshore hedge funds have different legal structures, which lead to differences in share restrictions such as a lockup provision. We find that offshore investors collect higher illiquidity premium when their investment has the same level of share illiquidity as the investment of onshore investors. Introducing a lockup provision increases the abnormal return by 4.4% per year for offshore funds compared with only 2.7% for onshore funds during the period of 1994-2005. We argue that the difference is explained by the stronger relationship between share illiquidity and asset illiquidity in offshore hedge funds. We also find that the benefit of offshore investors is maximized when they invest in offshore hedge funds that are not affected by onshore funds through a masterfeeder structure.
منابع مشابه
Return Smoothing, Liquidity Costs, and Investor Flows: Evidence from a Separate Account Platform
We use a new dataset of hedge fund returns from a separate account platform to examine (1) how much of hedge fund return smoothing is due to main-fund specific factors, such as managerial reporting discretion (2) the costs of removing hedge fund share restrictions. These accounts trade pari passu with matching hedge funds but feature third-party reporting and permissive share restrictions. We u...
متن کاملOnshore and Offshore Hedge Funds: Are They Twins?
Contrary to offshore hedge funds, US-registered (“onshore”) funds are subject to strict marketing prohibitions, accredited investor requirements, limited number of investors, and tax disadvantage. We exploit this difference to test predictions about organizational design, capital flow, and fund performance. We find that onshore funds impose stronger share restrictions such as a lockup provision...
متن کاملFunding Liquidity Risk and the Dynamics of Hedge Fund Lockups
We exploit the expiring nature of hedge fund lockups to create a dynamic, fund-level proxy of funding liquidity risk. In contrast to the prior literature, our measure allows us to identify how within-fund changes in funding liquidity risk are associated with performance and risk taking. Lockup funds with lower funding liquidity risk take more tail risk and have better risk-adjusted performance,...
متن کاملLiquidity Spillovers in Hedge Funds: Evidence from the Holdings of Funds of Hedge Funds
We examine whether funds of hedge funds (FoFs) engage in costly fire sales of their hedge fund investments during the 2004–2011 period. We find that FoFs experiencing large outflows tend to liquidate holdings in funds with relatively few redemption restrictions (“liquid funds”), even when these funds perform well. A tracking portfolio that buys liquid funds involved in fire sales over the prior...
متن کاملDiscretionary liquidity: Hedge funds, side pockets, and gates
During the recent financial crisis, more than 30% of hedge fund managers used their discretion to restrict investor liquidity through the use of “gates” or “side pockets.” Using a database of hedge fund investor interests, this paper is the first to empirically examine the determinants of these discretionary liquidity restrictions (DLRs) and their consequences for hedge fund investors. We find ...
متن کامل