MISQ Archivist Governance of Corporate Takeovers: Time for Say-on-Takeovers?
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this article, we study the potential for digital, online information and electronic voting to improve shareholder surplus by facilitating a new governance structure, owner-governance, which shifts control of the takeover decision from the board to shareholders. We compare analytical models of owner-governance to the current practice of delegatedgovernance in the context of increasing availability of online information which increases public informedness. Our analysis shows that shareholders of the target firm and the acquirer both prefer owner-governance to delegatedgovernance when informedness is sufficiently high. Interestingly, we find a region where owner-governance offers a higher probability of takeover but delegated-governance offers higher shareholder surplus. Under delegated-governance, the board endogenously sets an entrenchment level that is always greater than the entrenchment level preferred by the shareholders and increasing informedness reduces the probability of a takeover. Our results suggest that ownergovernance should be considered because of increasing informedness.
منابع مشابه
The Role of Hostile Takeovers in Corporate Governance
The study makes a distinction between the role of hostile takeovers as a mechanism for downsizing and exit in the process of ‘creative destruction’ and the role of hostile takeovers as a corporate governance mechanism for curbing managerial slack and opportunism. The likelihood that underperforming firms with ineffective internal governance structures are the targets of hostile takeover bids is...
متن کاملGovernance of Corporate Takeovers: Time for Say-on-Takeovers?
Table A1. Glossary of Governance and Takeover Germs Term Description Hostile takeover Acquirer makes takeover offer without target firm board consent or approval Unsolicited takeover Generally synonymous with hostile takeover. Also means the offer was not requested by the target firm board. Antitakeover provisions Target firm provisions in the bylaws or board approved motions to prevent unsolic...
متن کاملTAKEOVERS AND COOPERATIVES:∗ Governance and Stability in Non-corporate Firms
If consumers wholly or partially control a firm with market power they will charge less than the profit maximizing price. Starting at the usual monopoly price, a small price reduction will have a second order effect on profits but a first order effect on consumer surplus. Despite this desirable static result, it has been argued that cooperatives are vulnerable to take-over by outsiders who will...
متن کاملAuzius Kazombo Mwale Department of Accounting & Finance Testing the inefficient management hypothesis: Are United Kingdom mergers and acquisitions disciplinary?
A large body of research has examined the impact of takeovers on corporate performance. Although there has been a considerable volume of research on the wealth effects of takeovers to date, there has been very little evidence on the disciplinary role. The aim of this study is to contribute to the takeover debate by examining whether UK takeovers are disciplinary. This study replicates previous ...
متن کاملvorking paper department of economics Breach of Trust in Takeovers and the Optimal Corporate Charter
This paper analyzes how takeovers and takeover defenses affect the value of target companies, using an incomplete contracts framework. We consider a raider who intends to improve the efficiency of production and to appropriate the rents enjoyed by stakeholders of the company. Anticipating this rent shifting the stakeholders invest too little in relationship specific assets which may offset the ...
متن کامل