Railway bonus and aircraft malus for different directions of the sound source?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Even for same LAeq, noise immissions from different types of traffic noise elicit not always the same loudness and annoyance. Frequently, railway noise is perceived as less annoying than road traffic noise (railway bonus), whereas aircraft noise can be perceived as more annoying than road traffic noise (aircraft malus). As one possible reason for the aircraft malus in addition to differences in spectral distribution and temporal structure sometimes the hypothesis is put forward that sounds which come from above a person are perceived as particularly dangerous and annoying. In order to challenge this hypothesis, psychoacoustic experiments were performed in which the same immissions of equal LAeq from railway noise, road traffic noise, and aircraft noise were presented by loudspeakers in front of versus above the subjects. They had to rate the overall loudness of the noise immissions by category scaling, magnitude estimation, and line length. Results are presented in which the magnitude of bonus or malus is given as a function of the direction of the sound sources. For presentation in front of the subjects, both railway bonus and aircraft malus were found. However, for “natural" situations like road traffic noise from front and aircraft noise from above, no aircraft malus showed up.
منابع مشابه
Noise-induced annoyance from transportation noise: short-term responses to a single noise source in a laboratory.
An experimental study was performed to compare the annoyances from civil-aircraft noise, military-aircraft noise, railway noise, and road-traffic noise. Two-way within-subjects designs were applied in this research. Fifty-two subjects, who were naive listeners, were given various stimuli with varying levels through a headphone in an anechoic chamber. Regardless of the frequency weighting networ...
متن کاملExperimental studies on sleep disturbances due to railway and road traffic noise
A “bonus” of 5 dB has been applied to railway noise in most European Union (EU) countries, e.g. Austria, Germany, France and Sweden. The reason for this is that the majority of international and Swedish studies show that railway noise is less annoying than road traffic noise and aircraft noise (Miedema & Oudshoorn 2001; EU position paper 2002). According to the meta-analysis (Miedema & Oudshoor...
متن کاملThe effects of railway noise on sleep medication intake: results from the ALPNAP-study.
In the 1980s/90s, a number of socio-acoustic surveys and laboratory studies on railway noise effects have observed less reported disturbance/interference with sleep at the same exposure level compared with other modes of transportation. This lower grade of disturbance has received the label "railway bonus", was implemented in noise legislation in a number of European countries and was applied i...
متن کاملPartial and Total Annoyance Due to Road Traffic Noise Combined with Aircraft or Railway Noise: Structural Equation Analysis
Structural equation modeling was used to analyze partial and total in situ annoyance in combined transportation noise situations. A psychophysical total annoyance model and a perceptual total annoyance model were proposed. Results show a high contribution of Noise exposure and Noise sensitivity to Noise annoyance, as well as a causal relationship between noise annoyance and lower Dwelling satis...
متن کاملBonus-malus Scales Using Exponential Loss Functions
This paper focuses on techniques for constructing Bonus-Malus systems in third party liability automobile insurance. Specifically, the article presents a practical method for constructing optimal Bonus-Malus scales with reasonable penalties that can be commercially implemented. For this purpose, the symmetry between the overcharges and the undercharges reflected in the usual quadratic loss func...
متن کامل