Immunosuppression minimization: current and future trends in transplant immunosuppression.

نویسنده

  • Flavio Vincenti
چکیده

The past decade has witnessed unprecedented advances in renal transplantation propelled by novel and effective immunosuppression drugs. The introduction of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus, cyclosporine microemulsion, sirolimus, a new generation of monoclonal antibodies (the anti–interleukin-2 receptor blockers, daclizumab and basiliximab), and the depleting polyclonal biologic Thymoglobulin has provided transplant physicians with a wide choice in selecting effective immunosuppression regimens (1–5). The intensification of immunosuppression, however, results in overimmunosuppression–associated complications such as opportunistic infections and malignancies. This is exemplified by the emergence of a previously rare infection, BK virus nephropathy, which may account for irreversible graft loss in 3 to 5% of renal transplant recipients (6). The threat of malignancy is yet another risk confronting patients on long-term immunosuppression, reported to occur in up to 40% of patients by 20 yr after transplantation (7). Another factor limiting improvement in long-term outcome is the occurrence of cardiovascular disease, a major cause of death in renal transplant recipients (8,9). Many of the current immunosuppression drugs are associated with one or more risk factors that predispose to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Of the current immunosuppressive agents in use, corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) are the most pro-atherogenic drugs (9). The cardiovascular risk of sirolimus is unclear: it can induce hyperlipidemia, but it has also been shown to inhibit intimal and smooth muscle cell proliferation (10). The prospect for approval by the Food and Drug Administration of newer and more specific immunosuppressive drugs that lack nephrotoxicity and cardiovascular toxicities is several years away (4). No new drug or biologic agent is currently in phase III trial; it is thus unlikely that novel therapy for renal or solid organ transplantation will be approved before the latter part of the decade (4). In the interim, drug minimization regimens in select patient populations are being explored to improve the safety of immunosuppression regimens while preserving their efficacy. The two main classes of drugs that are targeted for drug minimization are corticosteroid and CNI. Drug minimization strategies are not safe for all patients, and patient selection is as important as the choice of the minimization protocol (11). This review will summarize current and emerging drug minimization strategies.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Role of Immunosuppression Minimization Protocols in Renal Transplantation

The subject of transplant immunosuppression has generated significant interest in recent years. Excellent immunosuppression, advances in surgical technique, post-transplantation care, and infection control have resulted in excellent outcomes. There is widespread support for the notion that the fundamental objective in transplant immunology should be the achievement of specific graft toleran...

متن کامل

Pediatric Liver Transplant

The goals of post-transplant management are to manage and treat postoperative complications, and develop a balanced long-term immunotherapy regimen that minimizes infection and side effects but controls rejection. While modern immunosuppressant regimes have reduced rates of graft loss due to rejection, they impart major risks for infection, growth failure, metabolic complications, and malignanc...

متن کامل

Relationship between post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and Anti-Thymocyte Globulin or Anti-Lymphocyte Globulin

 Abstract Background: Lymphoproliferative disorders are among the most serious and potentially fatal complications of chronic immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients. The principle risk factors for development of PTLD are the degree of overall immunosuppression and the EBV serostatus of the recipient. In this study, the risk of PTLD in kidney transplant recipients who received Anti- L...

متن کامل

Application of Operational Tolerance Signatures Are Limited by Variability and Type of Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND Renal transplant recipients (RTR) frequently develop complications relating to chronic immunosuppression. Identifying RTR who could safely reduce immunosuppression is therefore highly desirable. We hypothesized that "signatures" described in RTR who have stopped immunosuppression but maintained stable graft function ("operational tolerance") may enable identification of immunosuppres...

متن کامل

Liver transplantation: immunosuppression and oncology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW Long-term survival of liver transplant recipients is threatened by increased rates of de-novo malignancy and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), both events tightly related to immunosuppression. RECENT FINDINGS There is accumulating evidence linking increased exposure to immunosuppressants and carcinogenesis, particularly concerning calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), a...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN

دوره 14 7  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003