Voting and Information Aggregation in Unicameral Parliamentary and Semi-Presidential Democracies
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper investigates legislation in parliamentary and semi-presidential democracies where the legislature and the president have formal role in legislation. A proposed law is rst voted in the legislature and if it passes, comes to the consideration of the president. I study two prevalent legislative procedures: (i) Single-round legislation where the presidents action is nal, (ii) Two-round legislation the presidents approval enacts the law but after his veto proposal returns to the legislature for rediscussion. In this setup I examine power balance and the e¢ ciency of information aggregation. For this I build a model of strategic voting with incomplete information and analyze di¤erent ideological pro les of the president and the homogenous legislature. The president seems powerless in two-round legislation but in equilibrium there are instances he can change the legislation result. Power struggle arises only when the legislature is modernist and the president is conservative. If the legislature is conservative and the president is modernist, the president has no imPreprint submitted to Elsevier Science 21 April 2010 pact on the outcome, but adversely a¤ects informational e¢ ciency. If they have the same ideological bias, the presidential institution is bene cial and the presidents existence provides full information aggregation with nite legislature size in singleround legislation. Above results can be generalized to heterogeneous legislature with two types, except full information aggregation is never achieved. JEL Numbers: D72, D78
منابع مشابه
Presidentialism, Electoral Identifiability, and Budget Balances in Democratic Systems
This paper examines the impact of the form of government—–presidential or parliamentary—–on fiscal outcomes in democratic systems. Based on data for democracies in 98 countries between 1970 and 2002, it shows that the gross domestic product ratio of the central government budget balance is higher in presidential than in parliamentary democracies. It also shows that this impact is not due to the...
متن کاملDEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND REGIME SURVIVAL: Parliamentary and Presidential Democracies Reconsidered
We review arguments and empirical evidence found in the comparative literature that bear on the differences in the survival rates of parliamentary and presidential democracies. Most of these arguments focus on the fact that presidential democracies are based on the separation of executive and legislative powers, while parliamentary democracies are based on the fusion of these powers. From this ...
متن کاملInstitutional determinants of military spending
Drawing on a database for 1988-2006 containing information on 157 countries, we investigate the effects on military spending of government form, electoral rules, concentration of parliamentary parties, and ideology. From an OLS regression on pooled data, our results show that presidential democracies spend more than parliamentary systems on defense, whereas the presence of a plurality voting sy...
متن کاملSystems of Government: Parliamentarism and Presidentialism February 2003 Parliamentary and Presidential Democracies: Which One is Best? With the exception of the United States, where a system of separation of executive and legislative powers
Parliamentary and Presidential Democracies: Which One is Best? With the exception of the United States, where a system of separation of executive and legislative powers exists, all countries that are considered to be stable democracies adopt a constitution that is, at least partially, parliamentary. A parliamentary constitution is characterized by the fusion of executive and legislative powers,...
متن کاملSystems of Government: Parliamentarism and Presidentialism
Parliamentary and Presidential Democracies: Which One is Best? With the exception of the United States, where a system of separation of executive and legislative powers exists, all countries that are considered to be stable democracies adopt a constitution that is, at least partially, parliamentary. A parliamentary constitution is characterized by the fusion of executive and legislative powers,...
متن کامل