Cities, Institutions, and Growth: The Emergence of Zipf’s Law
نویسنده
چکیده
Zipf’s Law characterizes city populations as obeying a distributional power law and is supposedly one of the most robust regularities in all of economics. This paper shows, to the contrary, that Zipf’s Law only emerged in Europe between 1500 and 1800. It documents how Zipf’s Law emerged with the development of markets in the centuries preceding the onset of modern economic growth. It shows that the longrun historical evidence is consistent with random growth theories of Zipfs Law. Because land and land-intensive intermediates entered city production as quasifixed factors, big cities grew relatively slowly and were “too small” before 1500. Then, as trade and rising agricultural productivity relaxed the land constraint, it became possible for growth to become random, for big cities to appear, and for Zipf’s Law to emerge. Random growth and Zipf’s Law emerged early to Western Europe. However, the institutions of the “second serfdom” in Eastern Europe were associated with delayed emergence. I find that laws limiting labor mobility and sectoral reallocation were associated with two factors that generate persistent deviations from Zipf’s Law: relatively low variation in growth rates and a negative association between city sizes and growth rates. These legal institutions were also associated with a 1/3 reduction in city growth in Eastern Europe 1500-1800. ∗Contact: Department of Economics, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20016. Email: [email protected]. I thank Barry Eichengreen, Chad Jones, Christina Romer, Brad DeLong, Xavier Gabaix, Suresh Naidu, and seminar participants at UC Berkeley, UC Davis, Dartmouth, UBC, and American for comments and suggestions. The errors are mine. 1
منابع مشابه
Emergent Cities: Micro-foundations of Zipf’s Law†
The tendency for human beings, economic firms and social institutions to locate together has been the subject of intellectual inquiry for centuries. People and firms are not spread ubiquitously across the globe but have a powerful tendency to organize in well-defined geographic units, cities. First Auerbach (1913) and then Zipf (1941; 1949) observed a striking regularity in this process, noting...
متن کاملCards-Shuffling Model for Urban Development
Hierarchy of cities reflects the ubiquitous structure frequently observed in the natural world and social institutions. Where there is a hierarchy with cascade structure, there is a Zipf’s rank-size distribution, and vice versa. However, we have no theory to explain the spatial dynamics associated with Zipf’s law of cities. In this paper, a new angle of view is proposed to find the simple rules...
متن کاملZipf's law for all the natural cities in the United States: a geospatial perspective
This paper provides a new geospatial perspective on whether or not Zipf’s law holds for all cities or for the largest cities in the United States using a massive dataset and its computing. A major problem around this issue is how to define cities or city boundaries. Most of the investigations of Zipf’s law rely on the demarcations of cities imposed by census data, e.g., metropolitan areas and c...
متن کاملZipf’s Law: A Microfoundation
Existing explanations of Zipf’s law (Pareto exponent approximately equal to 1) in size distributions require strong assumptions on growth rates or the minimum size. I show that Zipf’s law naturally arises in general equilibrium when individual units solve a homogeneous problem (e.g., homothetic preferences, constant-returns-to-scale technology), the units appear and disappear at a small constan...
متن کامل