Paul Wolfskehl and the Wolfskehl Prize
نویسندگان
چکیده
1294 NOTICES OF THE AMS VOLUME 44, NUMBER 10 T o the question often posed to Andrew Wiles in interviews— namely, what fascinated him so greatly in the Fermat conjecture—he seldom refrained from answering by emphasizing the long history of this problem. When I asked him the same question in Boston in 1995, he answered, “Because of its romantic history.” When I then went further and asked him to explain to me in more detail what he meant by romantic, he answered merely, “Because Fermat said he had a proof, but none was found.” That Wiles avoided answering in detail what is so romantic about the history of Fermat’s Last Theorem reflects the fact that he also has a particularly romantic part to play in this story. The first time that I became aware of this was on October 28, 1995, the day after the awarding of the Prix Fermat to Wiles in the Salle des Illustres in the town hall in Toulouse. It was the last true day of autumn, with striking blue skies and temperatures worthy of summer, when Andrew Wiles visited the house in which Fermat was born in Beaumont-de-Lomagne. There he found the people in the highest of spirits on account of his mastering of this ancient enigma, and he was truly the man of the hour in this small relaxed town in the south of France, whose character had scarcely changed since the time of Fermat himself: Andrew had met Pierre. Wiles also met the romance in the history of Fermat’s Last Theorem on June 27, 1997, in Göttingen, where he was presented with the Wolfskehl Prize by the Academy of Science. Gerhard Frey gave the closing lecture, “On the Fermat problem, the conjecture of Taniyama and the theorem of Wiles”. Since so much nonsense has been written about this prize and also about its donor Paul Wolfskehl, even by respected authors, and taken up blindly by other authors, I now see, through the presenting of this prize and the public awareness that goes with it, the last opportunity to do Paul Wolfskehl and his donation the justice they deserve. Klaus Barner is professor of mathematics at the University of Kassel, Germany. His e-mail address is klaus@ mathematik.uni-kassel.de. “This article is an updated and revised translation of my paper ‘Paul Wolfskehl und der Wolfskehlpreis’, Mathematische Schriften Kassel, Vordruckreihe des Fachbereichs 17, Preprint Nr. 4/97, March 1997. I would like to thank Alex Reckless for his valuable help during the process of translating. In my attempt to learn more about Wolfskehl and his family, I have been greatly assisted by Kurt-R. Biermann, Eckhart G. Franz, Erhard Heil, Paul Hoffmann, Charlotte Kühner-Wolfskehl, Sabine Rickmann, Heinz Georg Wagner, and Ingeborg Wolfskehl. I thank them all deeply. Special thanks go to Ingeborg Wolfskehl for letting me have a copy of the possibly last existing photo of Paul Wolfskehl.”
منابع مشابه
Book Review: The Millennium Problems: The Seven Greatest Unsolved Mathematical Puzzles of Our Time, Volume 50, Number 8
On May 24, 2000, the Clay Mathematics Institute (CMI), inspired by the centenary of the Hilbert Challenge and seeking to put its own stamp on the new century and perhaps beyond, announced awards of one million dollars each for solutions to seven “Millennium Prize Problems” [6]. The problems selected by the CMI were neither new nor concerned with pressing practical matters. Ordinarily the popula...
متن کاملIntroduction to the 2005 rumelhart prize special issue honoring paul smolensky.
This special issue honors the research contributions of Dr. Paul Smolensky, recipient of the 2005 David E. Rumelhart Prize. This prize was instituted in 2001, funded by the Robert J. Glushko and Pamela Samuelson Foundation. The prize is awarded annually to an individual or collaborative team making a significant contemporary contribution to the formal analysis of human cognition. Mathematical m...
متن کاملThe optimal prize structure of symmetric Tullock contests
We show that the optimal prize structure of symmetric n-player Tullock tournaments assigns the entire prize pool to the winner, provided that a symmetric pure strategy equilibrium exists. If such an equilibrium fails to exist under the winner-take-all structure, we construct the optimal prize structure which improves existence conditions by dampening efforts. If no such optimal equilibrium exis...
متن کاملTo err and win a nobel prize: Paul Boyer, ATP synthase and the emergence of bioenergetics.
Paul Boyer shared a Nobel Prize in 1997 for his work on the mechanism of ATP synthase. His earlier work, though (which contributed indirectly to his triumph), included major errors, both experimental and theoretical. Two benchmark cases offer insight into how scientists err and how they deal with error. Boyer's work also parallels and illustrates the emergence of bioenergetics in the second hal...
متن کاملLearning Levers: Learners Inventing New Ways to Deepen, Broaden and Accelerate Their Learning
I also want to recognize one other person who is responsible more than any other for the idea to create a Prize addressing this subject, and that person is my long-time colleague, frequent collaborator, sometime toughest critic, and close friend, Paul R. Dimond. The idea for this Prize grew out of many conversations over the years between us. Paul possesses a rare combination of keen intelligen...
متن کامل