Selling to Overcondent Consumers
نویسنده
چکیده
Consumers may overestimate the precision of their demand forecasts. This overcon dence creates an incentive for both monopolists and competitive rms to o¤er tari¤s with included quantities at zero marginal cost, followed by steep marginal charges. This matches observed cellphone service pricing plans in the US and elsewhere. An alternative explanation with common priors can be ruled out in favor of overcon dence based on observed customer usage patterns for a major US cellular phone service provider. The model can be reinterpreted to explain the use of at rates and late fees in rental markets, and teaser rates on loans. Nevertheless, rms may bene t from consumers losing their overcon dence. A previous version of this paper circulated under the title "Screening Overcon dent Consumers" (2005). I am very grateful to Jeremy Bulow, Jonathan Levin, and Andrzej Skrzypacz for many valuable discussions of the issues in the paper and to Katja Seim for help and advice especially in obtaining data. For helpful comments and suggestions, I would also like to thank three anonymous referees, Susan Athey, Simon Board, Carlos Corona, Liran Einav, Erik Eyster, Bob Gibbons, Richard Holden, Peter Lorentzen, Greg Rosston, Brian Viard, Bob Wilson, and seminar participants at Stanford, Berkeley, Northwestern, MIT, Princeton, Yale, Columbia, UCLA, Caltech, Harvard, and Penn. I am thankful for nancial support from the Taube Scholarship Fund Fellowship through a grant to the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, and from the State Farm Companies Foundation Doctoral Award.
منابع مشابه
Web Appendices to Selling to Overcondent Consumers
This appendix provides additional intuition based on option pricing for the result in Proposition 2. Consider the case of monopoly. At time one, the monopolist is selling a series of call options, or equivalently units bundled with put options, rather than units themselves. The marginal price charged for a unit q at time two is simply the strike price of the option sold on unit q at time one. T...
متن کاملLearning in Advance Selling with Heterogeneous Consumers∗
The advance selling strategy is implemented when a firm offers consumers the opportunity to order its product in advance of the regular selling season. Advance selling reduces uncertainty for both the firm and the buyer and enables the firm to update its forecast of future demand. The distinctive feature of the present study of advance selling is that we divide consumers into two groups, experi...
متن کاملThe Economics of Buyer Uncertainty: Advance Selling vs. Probabilistic Selling
Although Advance Selling and Probabilistic Selling differ in both motivation and implementation, we argue that they share a common characteristic—both offer consumers a choice involving buyer uncertainty. We develop a formal model to examine the general economics of purchase options that involve buyer uncertainty, explore the differences in buyer uncertainty created via these two strategies, an...
متن کاملPricing Strategies in Advance Selling: Should a Retailer Offer a Pre-order Price Guarantee?∗
I consider a retailer who sells a new product over two periods: advance and regular selling seasons. Experienced consumers learn their valuations for the product in the advance selling season, while inexperienced consumers learn only when the product becomes available in the regular selling season. The retailer is uncertain about the number of inexperienced consumers. Production takes place bet...
متن کاملSell Probabilistic Goods? A Behavioral Explanation for Opaque Selling
Probabilistic or opaque selling, whereby the seller hides the exact identity of the product until after the buyer makes the payment, has been used in practice and received considerable attention in the literature. Under what conditions, and why, is probabilistic selling attractive to firms? The extant literature has offered the following explanations: to price discriminate heterogeneous consume...
متن کامل